Cited by 323CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of on-target and off-target mutations generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and other sequence-specific nucleases

Open access
Zischewski, Julia, Fischer, Rainer, Bortesi, Luisa·2017·Biotechnology Advances

Abstract

The development of customizable sequence-specific nucleases such as TALENs, ZFNs and the powerful CRISPR/Cas9 system has revolutionized the field of genome editing. The CRISPR/Cas9 system is particularly versatile and has been applied in numerous species representing all branches of life. Regardless of the target organism, all researchers using sequence-specific nucleases face similar challenges: confirmation of the desired on-target mutation and the detection of off-target events. Here, we evaluate the most widely-used methods for the detection of on-target and off-target mutations in terms of workflow, sensitivity, strengths and weaknesses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.003

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 78 references

2 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–321 of 321

Metadata

Authors
Zischewski, J., Fischer, R., & Bortesi, L.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (DE)
Corresponding author
Bortesi, Luisa
Venue
Biotechnology Advances
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
95-104
ISSN
0734-9750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2565555627
Cited by
323
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 18
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council (269110)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, off-target mutations, TALEN, zinc finger nucleases, sequence-specific nucleases, genome editing, sensitivity
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Line, Deoxyribonucleases, Humans, Mutation, Mice, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review