Cited by 62Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Bias and ethical considerations in machine learning and the automation of perioperative risk assessment

Open access
O'Reilly-Shah, Vikas N., Gentry, Katherine R., Walters, Andrew M., Zivot, Joel, Anderson, Corrie T., Tighe, Patrick J.·2020·British Journal of Anaesthesia

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.040

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI solutions have led to inadvertent bias of modeling results, with increasing concerns and related examples across diverse populations.

    “As AI becomes more pervasive in both public and personal health across diverse populations, there have been increasing concerns, and related examples, of AI solutions leading to inadvertent bias of modeling results (45–48).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Reilly-Shah, V. N., Gentry, K. R., Walters, A. M., Zivot, J., Anderson, C. T., & Tighe, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
125
Issue
6
Pages
843-846
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081377657
Cited by
62
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
machine learning bias, ethical considerations, perioperative risk assessment, algorithmic fairness
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Anesthesiology, Automation, Humans, Bias, Risk Assessment, Perioperative Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review