Cited by 311Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth disparities and outcomesInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare

The social gradient in doctor-patient communication

Open access
Verlinde, Evelyn, De Laender, Nele, De Maesschalck, Stéphanie, Deveugele, Myriam, Willems, Sara·2012·International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, the importance of social differences in the physician-patient relationship has frequently been the subject of research. A 2002 review synthesised the evidence on this topic. Considering the increasing importance of social inequalities in health care, an actualization of this review seemed appropriate. METHODS: A systematic search of literature published between 1965 and 2011 on the social gradient in doctor-patient communication. In this review social class was determined by patient's income, education or occupation. RESULTS: Twenty original research papers and meta-analyses were included. Social differences in doctor-patient communication were described according to the following classification: verbal behaviour including instrumental and affective behaviour, non-verbal behaviour and patient-centred behaviour. CONCLUSION: This review indicates that the literature on the social gradient in doctor-patient communication that was published in the last decade, addresses new issues and themes. Firstly, most of the found studies emphasize the importance of the reciprocity of communication.Secondly, there seems to be a growing interest in patient's perception of doctor-patient communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: By increasing the doctors' awareness of the communicative differences and by empowering patients to express concerns and preferences, a more effective communication could be established.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1475-9276-11-12

Cites

61 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. DeVoe JE Wallace LS Fryer GE Measuring patients' perceptions of communication with healthcare providers: Do differences in demographic and socioeconomic characteristics matter? Health Expectations 2009 12 70 80 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00516.x 19250153 PMC4918748 · DOI
  2. Kaplan SGB Greenfield S Rogers W Ware J Patient and visit characteristics related to physician's participatory decision making style Med Care 1995 1176 1187 7500658
  3. Jensen JD King AJ Guntzviller LM Davis LA Patient-provider communication and low-income adults: Age, race, literacy, and optimism predict communication satisfaction Patient Education and Counseling 2010 79 30 35 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.041 19879093 · DOI
  4. Siminoff LA Graham GC Gordon NH Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: Disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors Patient Education and Counseling 2006 62 355 360 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.011 16860520 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Street RL Jr Gordon HS Ward MM Krupat E Kravitz RL Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others Med Care 2005 43 960 969 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178172.40344.70 16166865 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verlinde, E., De Laender, N., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., & Willems, S.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Verlinde, Evelyn
Venue
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published
2012
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
12
ISSN
1475-9276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008405683
Cited by
307
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal for Equity in Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
social gradient, physician-patient communication, social class, income, occupation, verbal behavior, nonverbal behavior, patient perspectives, patient empowerment
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Affective Symptoms, Communication, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Social Behavior, Social Class, Verbal Behavior, Models, Statistical, Patient-Centered Care, Cultural Diversity, Health Status Disparities, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review