Cited by 59Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionEating Disorders and Behaviors

Judging the health and attractiveness of female faces: is the most attractive level of facial adiposity also considered the healthiest?

Coetzee, Vinet, Re, Daniel, Perrett, David I., Tiddeman, Bernard P., Xiao, Dengke·2011·Body Image

Abstract

Perceived facial adiposity plays an important role in perceptions of both facial attractiveness and health, but people might differentiate between the level of adiposity they find most attractive and healthy. The aim of this study was therefore to test whether or not similar levels of adiposity in faces were preferred for judgments of health and attractiveness. Fifty-three Caucasian university students were asked to make three-dimensional female faces appear as healthy and attractive as possible by changing faces along a continuum that portrays the facial adiposity change associated with a change in body mass index. Results showed that women preferred a significantly lower level of facial adiposity when judging attractiveness than when judging health, while men did not differentiate between the 'most attractive' and 'most healthy' looking level of facial adiposity. These findings are discussed in terms of the sociocultural portrayal of female body ideals and the preference for healthy individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.12.003

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is broadly consistent with previous studies which suggest the same attractiveness preferences for both genders, although some studies have found small differences.

    “This is broadly consistent with previous studies which suggest the same attractiveness preferences for both genders (Coetzee et al., 2011; Stephen and Perera, 2014), although some studies have found small differences (Demarest and Allen, 2000; Bergstrom et al., 2004; Grossbard et al., 2011; Crossley et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coetzee, V., Re, D., Perrett, D. I., Tiddeman, B. P., & Xiao, D.
Affiliations
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Coetzee, Vinet
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
190-193
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062923362
Cited by
59
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
British Academy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
facial attractiveness, health perception, female faces, body mass index, sex differences, body ideals, sociocultural factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Beauty, Cues, Face, Female, Health Status, Humans, Judgment, Male, Scotland, Social Perception, Students, Body Mass Index, Sex Distribution, Adiposity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review