Normal body, beautiful body: Discrepant perceptions reveal a pervasive ‘thin ideal’ from childhood to adulthood
Abstract
We aimed to determine the developmental trajectory for the 'thin ideal' by evaluating discrepancies in objective ratings of female body attractiveness and normality in a sample of children and adults. One hundred and sixty Australian middle class male and female participants from four different age groups (range: 4-26 years) viewed sets of photos depicting female bodies that varied systematically on the dimension of width. Six photo sets were presented. Participants ranked three sets according to their perceptions of body normality and ranked the other three sets in terms of body attractiveness. Results indicated that for all age groups, attractiveness ratings were significantly thinner than normality ratings. These findings indicate that the thin ideal is already present in primary school children and remains stable into adulthood, with concerning implications for body dissatisfaction and related disorders. Further research is required to clarify the developmental origins of preferences for thinner-than-normal female bodies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been few attempts to directly address what the internal visual template of the ideal body for men and women looks like.
“To our knowledge, there have been few attempts to address this question directly [but see, e.g., (Brown and Slaughter, 2011; Mohamed et al., 2021)].”
From The degree to which the cultural ideal is internalized predicts judgments of male and female physical attractiveness (2022) · cites this paper as Brown and Slaughter, 2011
Cites
Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460 · Cited by 2,053 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ridley, B. J., Cornelissen, P. L., Maalin, N., Mohamed, S., Kramer, R. S. S., McCarty, K., & Tovée, M. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980277 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, F. L., & Slaughter, V.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Slaughter, Virginia
- Venue
- Body Image
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-125
- ISSN
- 1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993963245
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Body Image (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- thin ideal, body attractiveness, body dissatisfaction, body image development, female body size, children, adolescents, adults, developmental trajectories
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Australia, Beauty, Body Image, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Social Desirability, Thinness, Body Mass Index, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review