Cited by 12Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Comparing measurement of internalized weight stigma and body dissatisfaction.

Open access
Leget, Dakota L., LaCaille, Lara J., Pearl, Rebecca L.·2023·Body Image

Abstract

Respective conceptualizations of internalized weight stigma and body dissatisfaction are distinct; however, strong relationships between measures of these two constructs prompts consideration about if these are truly unique constructs or whether current measurement tools are not adequately capturing their uniqueness. In this cross-sectional study, 480 U.S. women (78.8% white; M BMI = 25.9) ages 18-40 years, recruited from Amazon's MechanicalTurk and a mid-sized university, completed an online survey with the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M), a modified Body Parts Satisfaction Scale (BPSS), and other validated measures of body image, eating behavior, and mental health. Exploratory factor analysis of the WBIS-M and the BPSS supported a two-factor solution, although two items from the WBIS-M loaded with BPSS items. After removing these items, the 9-item version of the WBIS-M demonstrated stronger relationships with dysfunctional eating and mental health symptoms than did the BPSS (ꞵ range = 0.32-0.62 vs. 0.01-0.18, respectively). Findings from this study provide evidence to support the validity of WBIS-M and BPSS measuring unique constructs, suggesting that internalized weight stigma can be differentiated from body dissatisfaction. This study also highlights the need for further research that examines current measurement tools for internalized weight stigma and body dissatisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101622

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leget, D. L., LaCaille, L. J., & Pearl, R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
Corresponding author
Leget, Dakota L.
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
47
Pages
101622
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386435217
Cited by
11
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Body Image (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • University of Minnesota Duluth
  • National Institutes of Health (DP2MH132938, K23HL140176, R03HL160603)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
internalized weight stigma, body dissatisfaction, construct validity, factor structure, dysfunctional eating, psychiatric symptoms, women
MeSH terms
Body Dissatisfaction, Weight Prejudice, Body Image, Body Weight, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Psychometrics, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review