Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural adaptations to bone loss in aging men and women

Russo, Cosimo Roberto, Lauretani, Fulvio, Seeman, Ego, Bartali, Benedetta, Bandinelli, Stefania, Di Iorio, Angelo, Guralnik, Jack, Ferrucci, Luigi·2006·Bone
DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.025

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Melton, 2000, Who has osteoporosis? A conflict between clinical and public health perspectives, J. Bone Miner. Res., 15, 2309, 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.12.2309 · DOI
  2. Beck, 2001, Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures, J. Bone Miner. Res., 16, 1108, 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.6.1108 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Seeman, 2003, Periosteal bone formation—A neglected determinant of bone strength, Perspect. N. Engl. J. Med., 349, 320, 10.1056/NEJMp038101 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Orwoll, 2003, Toward an expanded understanding of the role of the periosteum in skeletal health, Perspect. J. Bone Miner. Res., 18, 949, 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.949 · DOI
  5. Russo, 2003, Aging bone in men and women: beyond changes in bone mineral density, Osteoporos. Int., 14, 531, 10.1007/s00198-002-1322-y · DOI
  6. Frost, 1987, The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenetic mechanism of osteoporoses and the bone mass effects of mechanical and nonmechanical agents, Bone Miner., 2, 73
  7. Duan, 2001, The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women, J. Bone Miner. Res., 16, 2276, 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2276 · DOI
  8. Duan, 2001, Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss, J. Bone Miner. Res., 16, 2267, 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2267 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ruff, 1988, Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia, J. Orthop. Res., 6, 886, 10.1002/jor.1100060613 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ferrucci, 2000, Subsystems contributing to the decline in ability to walk: bridging the gap between epidemiology and geriatric practice in the InCHIANTI study, J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 48, 1618, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03873.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Augat, 1998, Accuracy of cortical and trabecular bone measurements with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), Phys. Med. Biol., 43, 2873, 10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/015 · DOI
  12. Bousson, 2000, CT of the middiaphyseal femur: cortical bone mineral density and relation to porosity, Radiology, 217, 179, 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00se11179 · DOI
  13. Hangartner, 1996, Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography, J. Bone Miner. Res., 11, 1518, 10.1002/jbmr.5650111019 · DOI
  14. Augat, 1998, Accuracy of cortical and trabecular bone measurements with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), Phys. Med. Biol., 43, 2873, 10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/015 · DOI
  15. Cheng, 1995, Estimation of structural and geometrical properties of cortical bone by computerized tomography in 78-year-old women, J. Bone Miner. Res., 10, 139, 10.1002/jbmr.5650100120 · DOI
  16. Ruff, 1984, Allometry between length and cross-sectional dimensions of the femur and tibia in Homo sapiens, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 65, 347, 10.1002/ajpa.1330650403 · DOI
  17. Bousson, 2001, Distribution of intracortical porosity in human midfemoral cortex by age and gender, J. Bone Miner. Res., 16, 1308, 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.7.1308 · DOI
  18. Maggio, 1997, Age-related cortical bone loss at the metacarpal, Calcif. Tissue Int., 60, 94, 10.1007/s002239900193 · DOI
  19. Thompson, 1980, Age changes in bone mineralization, cortical thickness, and haversian canal area, Calcif. Tissue Int., 31, 5, 10.1007/BF02407161 · DOI
  20. Lazenby, 2002, Circumferential variation in human second metacarpal cortical thickness: sex, age, and mechanical factors, Anat. Rec., 267, 154, 10.1002/ar.10099 · DOI
  21. Siniarska, 2000, Gender differences in body build and physiological functions in the adult population of Yucatan Mexico, Coll. Antropol., 24, 101
  22. Beck, 2000, Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data, J. Bone Miner. Res., 15, 2297, 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.12.2297 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ahlborg, 2003, Bone loss and bone size after menopause, N. Engl. J. Med., 349, 327, 10.1056/NEJMoa022464 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Russo, C. R., Lauretani, F., Seeman, E., Bartali, B., Bandinelli, S., Di Iorio, A., Guralnik, J., & Ferrucci, L.
Venue
Bone
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
112-118
ISSN
8756-3282
DOI
10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.025
Cited by
139
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.