The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macroscopic Models of Local Field Potentials and the Apparent 1/f Noise in Brain Activity
Open accessAbstract
The power spectrum of local field potentials (LFPs) has been reported to scale as the inverse of the frequency, but the origin of this 1/f noise is at present unclear. Macroscopic measurements in cortical tissue demonstrated that electric conductivity (as well as permittivity) is frequency-dependent, while other measurements failed to evidence any dependence on frequency. In this article, we propose a model of the genesis of LFPs that accounts for the above data and contradictions. Starting from first principles (Maxwell equations), we introduce a macroscopic formalism in which macroscopic measurements are naturally incorporated, and also examine different physical causes for the frequency dependence. We suggest that ionic diffusion primes over electric field effects, and is responsible for the frequency dependence. This explains the contradictory observations, and also reproduces the 1/f power spectral structure of LFPs, as well as more complex frequency scaling. Finally, we suggest a measurement method to reveal the frequency dependence of current propagation in biological tissue, and which could be used to directly test the predictions of this formalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dispersion and Absorption in Dielectrics I. Alternating Current Characteristics
Cole, K. S., & Cole, R. H. (1941) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1750906 · Cited by 10,152
Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity
Braitenberg, V., & Schüz, A. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03733-1 · Cited by 1,178 · cited 2×
“This assumption is certainly valid within a macroscopic app roach, and justified by the fact that the neuropil of cerebral cortex is made of a quasi-random arrang ement of cellular processes of very diverse size (8).”
BackgroundExtracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis
Nicholson, C., & Syková, E. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01261-2 · Cited by 914
Destexhe, A., Contreras, D., & Steriade, M. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-11-04595.1999 · Cited by 573
Cited by
The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A., & Koch, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3241 · Cited by 4,225
Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition
Wang, X.-J. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2008 · Cited by 1,939
Modelling and analysis of local field potentials for studying the function of cortical circuits
Einevoll, G. T., Kayser, C., Logothetis, N. K., & Panzeri, S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3599 · Cited by 857
Revealing neuronal function through microelectrode array recordings
Obien, M. E. J., Deligkaris, K., Bullmann, T., Bakkum, D. J., & Frey, U. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00423 · Cited by 705
Being Critical of Criticality in the Brain
Beggs, J. M., & Timme, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00163 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Bédard, C., & Destexhe, A.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2589-2603
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009939208
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macroscopic Models of Local Field Potentials and the Apparent 1/f Noise in Brain Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3951
- The paper
- Bédard, C., & Destexhe, A. (2009). Macroscopic Models of Local Field Potentials and the Apparent 1/f Noise in Brain Activity. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.