Cited by 5Ion channel regulation and functionProtein Structure and DynamicsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Voltage gating and 4-aminopyridine inhibition in the Shaker Kv channel revealed by a closed-state model

Open access
Pinto-Anwandter, Bernardo I.·2025·Biophysical Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The generation and propagation of action potentials in neurons relies on the coordinated activation of voltage-dependent sodium and potassium channels. The Kv1 (Shaker) family of potassium channels drives the repolarization phase of the action potential by opening and closing their pore, a process controlled by a voltage sensor domain. However, a molecular description of how the voltage sensor domain drives pore gating has been constrained by a lack of closed-state structures. Here, we present a structural model of the closed Shaker channel that reveals the structural basis of voltage gating. Using AlphaFold2-based conformational sampling, we identified a partially activated state of the voltage sensor which, when modeled with the full channel, produced a closed state. Based on this model we demonstrate that breaking a backbone hydrogen bond between the S4-S5 linker and S5 helices is a critical part of the activation pathway. Docking studies revealed a hydrophobic cavity in the closed pore that binds 4-aminopyridine, a potassium channel inhibitor used to enhance nerve conduction in multiple sclerosis. Our results demonstrate how the voltage sensor movement drives pore opening and provide a structural framework for developing new therapeutic agents targeting the closed state. We anticipate that the novel methods used in this work will allow the characterization of conformational dynamics in voltage-gated ion channels, enabling drug design efforts focused on state-dependent modulation of ion channels for neurological disorders treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpj.2025.06.029

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Pinto-Anwandter, B. I.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-08
Volume
124
Issue
15
Pages
2500-2510
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411593274
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Google LLC (GCP19980904)
  • PEW Charitable Trusts
  • University of Chicago
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM030376)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
Kv1 potassium channels, voltage-dependent gating, voltage-sensing domain, 4-aminopyridine, pore gating, action potential repolarization, multiple sclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review