Cited by 929Ion channel regulation and functionIon Transport and Channel RegulationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Interaction of Tetraethylammonium Ion Derivatives with the Potassium Channels of Giant Axons

Open access
Armstrong, Clay M.·1971·The Journal of General Physiology

Abstract

A number of compounds related to TEA+ (tetraethylammoniumion) were injected into squid axons and their effects on gK (the potassium conductance) were determined. In most of these ions a quaternary nitrogen is surrounded by three ethyl groups and a fourth group that is very hydrophobic. Several of the ions cause inactivation of gK, a type of ionic gating that is not normally seen in squid axon; i.e., after depolarization gK increases and then spontaneously decreases to a small fraction of its peak value even though the depolarization is maintained. Observations on the mechanism of this gating show that (a) QA (quaternary ammonium) ions only enter K+ channels that have open activation gates (the normal permeability gates). (b) The activation gates of QA-occluded channels do not close readily. (c) Hyperpolarization helps to clear QA ions from the channels. (d) Raising the external K+ concentration also helps to clear QA ions from the channels. Observations (c) and (d) strongly suggest that K+ ions traverse the membrane by way of pores, and they cannot be explained by the usual type of carrier model. The data suggest that a K+ pore has two distinct parts: a wide inner mouth that can accept a hydrated K+ ion or a TEA+-like ion, and a narrower portion that can accept a dehydrated or partially dehydrated K+ ion, but not TEA+.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1085/jgp.58.4.413

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, Clay M.
Venue
The Journal of General Physiology
Published
1971-10-01
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
413-437
ISSN
  • 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7748
OpenAlex
W2006090981
Cited by
929
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 33
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of General Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
tetraethylammonium, quaternary ammonium ions, potassium channels, potassium conductance, channel inactivation, ion gating, activation gate, pore model, potassium ion permeation, hyperpolarization, external potassium concentration, squid giant axon, ion selectivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Cell Membrane Permeability, Ion Exchange, Ions, Membrane Potentials, Models, Biological, Mollusca, Potassium, Tetraethylammonium Compounds, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review