Scanning ultrasound in the absence of blood-brain barrier opening is not sufficient to clear β-amyloid plaques in the APP23 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
Abstract
A major challenge in treating brain diseases is presented by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that constitutes an efficient barrier not only for toxins but also a wide range of therapeutic agents. In overcoming this impediment, ultrasound in combination with intravenously injected microbubbles has emerged as a powerful technology that allows for the selective brain uptake of blood-borne factors and therapeutic agents by transient opening of the blood-brain barrier. We have previously shown that ultrasound in combination with microbubbles, but in the absence of a therapeutic agent, can effectively clear protein aggregates such as the hallmark lesions of Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and Tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles. We have also demonstrated that the associated memory and motor impairments can be ameliorated or even restored. These studies included a negative sham control that received microbubbles in the absence of ultrasound. However, considering that ultrasound on its own is a pressure wave which has bioeffects, the possibility remained that ultrasound, without microbubbles, would also clear amyloid. We addressed this by performing repeated ultrasound only treatments of one brain hemisphere of Aβ-depositing APP23 mice, using the contralateral hemisphere as the unsonicated control. This was followed by an extensive histological analysis of fibrillar and non-fibrillar amyloid. We found that ultrasound on its own was not sufficient to clear amyloid. This implies that although ultrasound on its own has neuromodulatory effects, exogenously supplied microbubbles are required for the clearance of Aβ deposits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Nisbet, R. M., Van der Jeugd, A., Leinenga, G., Evans, H. T., Janowicz, P. W., & Götz, J. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx052 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationMicrobubble-Assisted Ultrasound for Drug Delivery in the Brain and Central Nervous System
Burgess, A., & Hynynen, K. (2016) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22536-4_16 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The blood-brain barrier: Physiology and strategies for drug delivery
Pandit, R., Chen, L., & Götz, J. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.11.009 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Self-citationBlood-brain barrier leakage in Alzheimer’s disease: From discovery to clinical relevance
Nehra, G., Bauer, B., & Hartz, A. M. S. (2022) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108119 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leinenga, G., Koh, W. K., & Götz, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Götz, Jürgen
- Venue
- Brain Research Bulletin
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 153
- Pages
- 8-14
- ISSN
- 0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964544355
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Keywords
- ultrasound, blood-brain barrier, amyloid plaques, Alzheimer's disease, APP23 mice, microbubbles, amyloid clearance, neuromodulation
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Ultrasonic Therapy, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microbubbles, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review