Cited by 31Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Scanning ultrasound in the absence of blood-brain barrier opening is not sufficient to clear β-amyloid plaques in the APP23 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

Leinenga, Gerhard, Koh, Wee Kiat, Götz, Jürgen·2019·Brain Research Bulletin

Abstract

A major challenge in treating brain diseases is presented by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that constitutes an efficient barrier not only for toxins but also a wide range of therapeutic agents. In overcoming this impediment, ultrasound in combination with intravenously injected microbubbles has emerged as a powerful technology that allows for the selective brain uptake of blood-borne factors and therapeutic agents by transient opening of the blood-brain barrier. We have previously shown that ultrasound in combination with microbubbles, but in the absence of a therapeutic agent, can effectively clear protein aggregates such as the hallmark lesions of Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and Tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles. We have also demonstrated that the associated memory and motor impairments can be ameliorated or even restored. These studies included a negative sham control that received microbubbles in the absence of ultrasound. However, considering that ultrasound on its own is a pressure wave which has bioeffects, the possibility remained that ultrasound, without microbubbles, would also clear amyloid. We addressed this by performing repeated ultrasound only treatments of one brain hemisphere of Aβ-depositing APP23 mice, using the contralateral hemisphere as the unsonicated control. This was followed by an extensive histological analysis of fibrillar and non-fibrillar amyloid. We found that ultrasound on its own was not sufficient to clear amyloid. This implies that although ultrasound on its own has neuromodulatory effects, exogenously supplied microbubbles are required for the clearance of Aβ deposits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.08.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leinenga, G., Koh, W. K., & Götz, J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Götz, Jürgen
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
153
Pages
8-14
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964544355
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
ultrasound, blood-brain barrier, amyloid plaques, Alzheimer's disease, APP23 mice, microbubbles, amyloid clearance, neuromodulation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Ultrasonic Therapy, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microbubbles, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review