Cited by 89Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Let me check that for you: Symptom accommodation in romantic partners of adults with Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

Boeding, Sara E., Paprocki, Christine M., Baucom, Donald H., Abramowitz, Jonathan S., Wheaton, Michael G., Fabricant, Laura E., Fischer, Melanie S.·2013·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is typically considered from the perspective of the individual, yet symptoms often occur within an interpersonal context. Family members often engage in accommodation, assisting patients with rituals in order to alleviate anxiety, prevent conflict, or "help out" with time-consuming compulsive behaviors. Prior research has primarily examined accommodation in parents of children with OCD or in adult caregiver relationships, where caregivers can include various family members (e.g., parents, romantic partners). The current study examined accommodation behaviors in romantic partners of adults with OCD. As part of a treatment study, 20 couples were assessed for accommodation behaviors, OCD symptoms, and relationship functioning before and after 16-sessions of cognitive-behavioral treatment. Accommodation was associated with the patient's OCD symptoms at pre-treatment, and negatively associated with the partners', but not the patients', self-reported relationship satisfaction. Post-treatment partner accommodation was also associated with poorer response to treatment. The implications of these findings are discussed within an interpersonal framework, and the benefits of including partners in the treatment of OCD are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2013.03.002

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boeding, S. E., Paprocki, C. M., Baucom, D. H., Abramowitz, J. S., Wheaton, M. G., Fabricant, L. E., & Fischer, M. S.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Boeding, Sara E.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
316-322
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035227214
Cited by
89
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, romantic partners, couples, relationship satisfaction, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment response, partner involvement in treatment, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Sexual Partners, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review