Cited by 101Family and Disability Support ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Stepping Stones Triple P plus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy improve parent, couple, and family adjustment following paediatric acquired brain injury? A randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a behavioural family intervention, Stepping Stones Triple P (SSTP), combined with an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) workshop in improving parent, family and couple outcomes following paediatric acquired brain injury (ABI).Participants and setting Fifty-nine parents (90% mothers) of children (mean age 7 years; 35 males, 24 females) with ABI.Intervention Participants were randomly assigned to a treatment (10-week group SSTP and ACT program) or a care-as-usual (CAU) control condition (10 weeks). Those in the CAU condition received the treatment after the waitlist period.Outcomes Self-report measures of parent psychological distress, parent psychological flexibility, parenting confidence, family functioning, and couple relationship, assessed at: pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 6-months post-intervention.Results Post-intervention, the treatment group showed significant, small to medium improvements relative to the CAU group (at the p < .05 level) on parent psychological distress, parent psychological flexibility, parent confidence in managing behaviours, family adjustment,and number of disagreements between parents. Most improvements were maintained at 6-months.Conclusions Parent skills training and ACT may be efficacious in improving parent, family, and couple outcomes in families of children with an ABI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.001

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Brown, F. L., Whittingham, K., Boyd, R. N., McKinlay, L., & Sofronoff, K.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Brown, Felicity L.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
73
Pages
58-66
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1670438112
Cited by
101
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
pediatric acquired brain injury, Stepping Stones Triple P, acceptance and commitment therapy, family intervention, parent training, psychological flexibility, parental confidence, family functioning, couple relationships, pediatric brain injury
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Brain Injuries, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Stress, Psychological, Parenting, Caregivers, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review