The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal dynamics of relief in avoidance conditioning and fear extinction: Experimental validation and clinical relevance
Open accessAbstract
The learning principles that guide the acquisition and extinction of avoidance are not fully understood. We developed a novel paradigm to study the temporal dynamics of relief, a putative reinforcer of avoidance, and the recovery of fear and avoidance following extinction. During conditioning, the avoidance action canceled the aversive unconditional stimulus (US), without terminating the predictive conditional stimulus (CS). Relief pleasantness was rated after fixed CS offsets, when US omission occured. Avoidance was effective to one CS, but not to another, to track stimulus-specific avoidance learning. Fear was extinguished under response prevention in a separate context. Recovery tests took place 24 h later, in both contexts and with a monetary cost added to the avoidance action. We found that avoidance gradually became stimulus-specific during conditioning, but hardly recovered during delayed testing. Across all phases, initial omissions of the aversive US triggered relief that gradually declined over consecutive omissions, in line with a theoretical prediction error signal. Participants that scored low on distress tolerance, however, displayed sustained levels of relief over continuous omissions. We propose that such forms of sustained relief may produce over-reinforcement of foregoing avoidance actions and promote the development of pathological avoidance. The current paradigm represents an efficacious tool to study the temporal dynamics of relief across avoidance learning and fear extinction and to characterize relief dysregulations in relation to psychopathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the availability of an avoidance response following fear extinction has been shown to increase levels of fear”
From Relapse of anxiety-related fear and avoidance: Conceptual analysis of treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy (2020) · cites this paper as Vervliet, Lange, & Milad, 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Avoidance may persist even after fear has been extinguished”
From Relapse of anxiety-related fear and avoidance: Conceptual analysis of treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy (2020) · cites this paper as Vervliet, Lange, & Milad, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_121117 · Cited by 20,772
(1998) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · Cited by 19,139
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.
Carter, M. J. (2014) · Therapeutic Recreation Journal · Cited by 15,154
The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure
Simons, J. S., & Gaher, R. M. (2005) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-005-7955-3 · Cited by 1,730
Fear Extinction as a Model for Translational Neuroscience: Ten Years of Progress
Milad, M. R., & Quirk, G. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131631 · Cited by 1,466
Self-citationMilad, M. R., Wright, C. I., Orr, S. P., Pitman, R. K., Quirk, G. J., & Rauch, S. L. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.10.011 · Cited by 1,197
Self-citationLeyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019712 · Cited by 868
Duits, P., Cath, D. C., Lissek, S., Hox, J. J., Hamm, A. O., Engelhard, I. M., van den Hout, M. A., & Baas, J. M. P. (2015) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22353 · Cited by 726
Fear Extinction and Relapse: State of the Art
Vervliet, B., Craske, M. G., & Hermans, D. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185542 · Cited by 671
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pittig, A., Wong, A. H. K., Glück, V. M., & Boschet, J. M. (2020) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103550 · Cited by 148
The validity of human avoidance paradigms.
Krypotos, A.-M., Vervliet, B., & Engelhard, I. (2018) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.011 · Cited by 95
Self-citationMartín, C. S., Jacobs, B., & Vervliet, B. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.103526 · Cited by 104
Self-citationDymond, S. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.007 · Cited by 79
From Extinction Learning to Anxiety Treatment: Mind the Gap
Carpenter, J. K., Pinaire, M., & Hofmann, S. G. (2019) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci9070164 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Vervliet, B., Lange, I., & Milad, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vervliet, Bram
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 96
- Pages
- 66-78
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2605638819
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- 7th European Community Framework Programme (PIOF-GA-2013-627743)
- University of Louisville (PF/10/005)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- relief, avoidance conditioning, fear extinction, response prevention, temporal dynamics, prediction error, distress tolerance, psychopathology
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Conditioning, Operant, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review