CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 217Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-case experimental designs. Evaluating interventions in research and clinical practice

Kazdin, Alan E.·2019·Behaviour Research and Therapy
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Single-case designs refer to a methodological approach that can be used to investigate the effectiveness of treatment with the individual client. The designs permit scientifically valid inferences to be drawn about the effects of treatment and hence offer advantages over alternative strategies such as the uncontrolled case study or open study that are used with the individual case. The present article discusses the key features of the methodology, illustrates specific designs and how inferences are drawn, and discusses critical issues (feasibility, generality of results, ethical issues) in the use of the designs. Essential features of the design, including ongoing assessment and drawing on the underlying thinking and logic of the designs can improve the clinical care for individual clients, even when the rigors of experimentation are not feasible or desirable. Lamentably, single-case methods are rarely trained among researchers or practitioners in psychology or related mental health professions. The designs could play a special role by improving individual care and therapeutic change, apart from the strength of the methodology as a purely research tool.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.015

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 50 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 217

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kazdin, A. E.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kazdin, Alan E.
ORCID
Kazdin, Alan E.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
117
Pages
3-17
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.015
OpenAlex
W2902271959
Cited by
217
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
single-case experimental design, treatment efficacy assessment, clinical practice, generalizability of results, research ethics, continuous assessment, therapeutic change
MeSH terms
Data Analysis, Single-Case Studies as Topic, Humans, Research Design, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review