CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 242scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growth and structure of authorship and co-authorship network in the strategic management realm: Evidence from the Strategic Management Journal

Open access
Koseoglu, Mehmet Ali·2016·BRQ Business Research Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to investigate the intellectual structure and evolution of author collaborations from articles published in the Strategic Management Journal between 1980 and 2014. This assessment includes the general view of authorship, authorship patterns, author productivity, ranking of authors, visualization of the co-authorship network, comparison of strategic management co-authorship network attributes with those of other disciplines, the evolution of main components and core authors in the networks by period, discussions on whether the strategic management network fits with the small world network theory, individual network attributes such as degree centrality, Bonacich's power index, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality. Finally, the authors provide an inclusive evaluation of the results, limitations, and suggestions for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 140 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Amsaveni, 2013, Authorship pattern and collaborative research in bioinformatics, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mobile Comput., 2, 230
  2. Fleming, 2004, Perfecting cross-pollination, Harv. Bus. Rev., 83, 22
  3. Maheswaran, 2008, Research publications in structural engineering based on Journal of structural engineering, Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud., 55, 17

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–241 of 241

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Koseoglu, M. A.
Venue
BRQ Business Research Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
153-170
ISSN
2340-9436 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001
OpenAlex
W2309393944
Cited by
242
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BRQ Business Research Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AYBU AVESIS (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
co-authorship networks, authorship patterns, author productivity, author ranking, core authors, small-world networks, network centrality, Strategic Management Journal, intellectual structure, strategic management research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review