Cited by 7Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Cutting-edge CNN-based skin cancer detection with batch normalization and advanced imbalance learning for superior medical image classification

Govindu, Surla, Devi, O.Rama, Sitharam, M., Koreddi, Venkatesh, Kumar, Meriga Kiran, Sunitha, M.·2026·Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108929

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Govindu, S., Devi, O. R., Sitharam, M., Koreddi, V., Kumar, M. K., & Sunitha, M.
Venue
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-03
Volume
113
Pages
108929
ISSN
1746-8094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416851316
Cited by
7
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
skin cancer detection, convolutional neural networks, batch normalization, group normalization, class imbalance, SMOTE, undersampling, oversampling, HAM10000 dataset, melanoma, dermatofibroma, medical image classification, rare class classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review