Cited by 4EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Evaluating spatial normalization for SVM-based EEG decoding: A within- and between-subjects perspective

Open access
Qin, Yuan, Xu, Qi, Kujala, Tuomo, Wang, Xiaoshuang, Cong, Fengyu·2026·Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Abstract

Normalization is widely used in electroencephalogram (EEG)-based multivariate pattern classification (MVPC) to reduce magnitude differences across trials and subjects. However, the spatial normalization method as applied to EEG channel-based brain maps has been rarely investigated in EEG-based decoding tasks like event-related potential (ERP) experiments. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of spatial normalization across diverse experimental paradigms remains unclear. This study evaluated the impact of spatial normalization on decoding accuracy using the support vector machine (SVM). The analysis included nine experimental paradigms, with seven binary ERP paradigms, one four-class facial expression paradigm, and one sixteen-class orientation paradigm. Results showed that spatial normalization significantly improved the between-subjects decoding accuracy (Cohen’s d = 1 . 39 , p < 0 . 001 ) but did not enhance the within-subjects decoding accuracy. Additionally, the morphological fidelity of the difference wave was preserved after spatial normalization, as evidenced by the high similarity between the normalized and original ERP difference waves across the seven binary paradigms. We validated our findings across diverse experimental paradigms and demonstrated that spatial normalization effectively enhances between-subjects decoding accuracy using SVM while preserving the temporal consistency of ERP, offering a generalizable preprocessing approach for EEG-based cognitive, clinical, and brain–computer interface (BCI) applications. • The effect of spatial normalization was evaluated on the EEG decoding performance using SVM. • Nine diverse paradigms (seven binary, two multi-category) were examined in the between and within-subjects conditions. • Spatial normalization enhanced between-subjects decoding accuracy but not within-subjects decoding accuracy. • Spatially normalized data preserved the morphological fidelity of the difference waves as evidenced by seven binary paradigms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bspc.2026.109535

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-subject evaluation on ERP CORE has been reported using fold-based splits and time-point-wise LOSO decoding, but neither provides an epoch-level LOSO classification benchmark under deployment-compatible constraints such as causal filtering.

    “Cross-subject evaluation on ERP CORE has been reported using fold-based splits [28] and time-point-wise LOSO decoding [29], but neither provides an epoch-level LOSO classification benchmark under deployment-compatible constraints such as causal filtering.”
  • To our knowledge, this is the first epoch-level LOSO benchmark on ERP CORE.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first epoch-level LOSO benchmark on ERP CORE.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qin, Y., Xu, Q., Kujala, T., Wang, X., & Cong, F.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiaoshuang
Venue
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-05
Volume
116
Pages
109535
ISSN
1746-8094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7119600739
Cited by
1
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council (201906060242)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91748105, 82402431)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
spatial normalization, EEG decoding, support vector machine, event-related potentials, multivariate pattern classification, difference waves, facial expression recognition, orientation discrimination, brain-computer interface, EEG preprocessing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review