Cited by 462Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisTransgenic Plants and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plant tissue culture as a perpetual source for production of industrially important bioactive compounds

Open access

Abstract

Plants have been used throughout the world for its medicinal powers since ancient time. The pharmacological properties of plants are based on their phytochemical components especially the secondary metabolites which are outstanding sources of value added bioactive compounds. Secondary metabolites have complex chemical composition and are produced in response to various forms of stress to perform different physiological tasks in plants. They are used in pharmaceutical industries, cosmetics, dietary supplements, fragrances, flavors, dyes, etc. Extended use of these metabolites in various industrial sectors has initiated a need to focus research on increasing the production by employing plant tissue culture (PTC) techniques and optimizing their large scale production using bioreactors. PTC techniques being independent of climatic and geographical conditions will provide an incessant, sustainable, economical and viable production of secondary metabolites. This review article intends to assess the advantages of using plant tissue culture, distribution of important secondary metabolites in plant families, strategies involved for optimal metabolite production and the industrial importance of selected secondary metabolites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00450

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 147 references

3 of the 147 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Palazón, 1997, Application of transformed root technology to the production of bioactive metabolites, Recent Res. Dev. Plant Physiol., 1, 125
  2. Bhowal, 2017, Coleus forskholii: phytochemical and pharmacological profile, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res., 8, 3599
  3. Srinivas Reddy, 2011, Approaches to enhance the production of Forskolin in cell cultures of Coleus forskohlii Briq, Int. J. Pharm. Sci., 3, 1434
  4. Christen, 1989, Cell cultures as a means to produce taxol, Proc. Amer. Assoc. Canc. Res., 30, 566
  5. Khadke, 2013, Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf and stem explants of N. foetida: acritically endangered plant species, Intl. J. Plant An. Envi. Sci., 3, 257

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 461

Metadata

Authors
Chandran, H., Meena, M., Barupal, T., & Sharma, K.
Affiliations
Mohanlal Sukhadia University (IN)
Corresponding author
Meena, Mukesh
Venue
Biotechnology Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
26
Pages
e00450
ISSN
2215-017X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3019219369
Cited by
462
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 11
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University Grants Committee
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Transgenic Plants and Applications
Keywords
plant tissue culture, secondary metabolites, bioactive compounds, bioreactors, mass production, medicinal plants, phytochemicals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review