The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation
Open accessAbstract
Digital technology is increasingly important in achieving business goals, and its pervasive effects have resulted in the radical restructuring of entire industries. Consequently, managers’ extensive interest in handling digital innovation is not surprising. Recent research has illustrated how digital technologies give rise to a vast potential for product and service innovation that is difficult to control and predict. Therefore, firms need dynamic tools to support themselves in managing the new types of digital innovation processes that emerge. The nature of these processes forces firms to challenge prior assumptions about their product and service portfolio, their digital environment, and ways of organizing innovation work. In this article, we present a managerial framework that supports firms in this undertaking. The framework, geared at supporting ongoing improvements in digital innovation management, covers five key areas: user experience, value proposition, digital evolution scanning, skills, and improvisation. We also present a diagnostic tool that can be utilized as firms begin the process of implementing the framework. Finally, we conclude with our thoughts on the managerial implications of the framework when going forward in a rapidly changing digital innovation landscape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 · Cited by 2,469
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0323 · Cited by 1,514
Cited by
Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization
Eller, R., Alford, P., Kallmünzer, A., & Peters, M. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.004 · Cited by 837
Growth paths for overcoming the digitalization paradox
Gebauer, H., Fleisch, E., Lamprecht, C., & Wortmann, F. (2020) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.005 · Cited by 380
A survey of smart product-service systems: Key aspects, challenges and future perspectives
Zheng, P., Wang, Z., Chen, C.-H., & Pheng Khoo, L. (2019) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2019.100973 · Cited by 377
Digital technologies in product-service systems: a literature review and a research agenda
Pirola, F., Boucher, X., Wiesner, S., & Pezzotta, G. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103301 · Cited by 252
Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view
Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Nylén, D., & Holmström, J.
- Venue
- Business Horizons
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-67
- ISSN
- 0007-6813 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017379636
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.001
- The paper
- Nylén, D., & Holmström, J. (2015). Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.