The DOI matches its Crossref record; 247 of the 247 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Structural equation modeling analysis of generative AI chatbots adoption among students and educators in higher education
Open accessAbstract
In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping educational paradigms, this study explores AI-based chatbot adoption in higher education among students and educators. Employing a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach, the research focuses on developing and validating a comprehensive model to understand the multifaceted factors impacting the acceptance and use of these chatbots. The methodology integrates an extensive literature review, construction of a theoretical model, administration of a detailed questionnaire to a representative sample from the higher education sector, coupled with advanced SEM techniques for data analysis and interpretation. The SEM analysis validates the model's robustness and highlights the relationships between several key factors affecting users' perspectives and chatbots adoption. Results reveal a predominantly positive perception towards AI-chatbots among both students and educators, underscoring the potential to substantially enrich their educational journey. However, it also uncovers critical concerns pertaining to trust, privacy, response bias, and information accuracy. Moreover, the study offers valuable insights into how moderators such as technological proficiency, user roles, and gender influence the adoption model relationships. This emphasizes the need for customizing AI-chatbots deployment to meet the diverse needs of users effectively. Contributing a robust framework for understanding users' perceptions towards AI-chatbots and their adoption patterns, this study offers actionable insights for educational leaders, policymakers, and technology developers. It also lays the groundwork for future research, including longitudinal studies to evaluate the long-term impact of these technologies, investigations into their effect on learning outcomes, and explorations of the ethical and privacy considerations involved.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“AI use regulations are discussed in relation to data privacy, ethical chatbot usage, and responsible implementation, highlighting the need for clear, enforceable institutional frameworks (Ichikawa et al., 2025; Saihi et al., 2024).”
From Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as Saihi et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“Lastly, predictive modelling of GenAI learning outcomes in the literature is dominated by regression and structural equation approaches [1, 52, 67]”
Citations
Cites
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
Leguina, A. (2015) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2015.1005806 · Cited by 18,921
ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5er8f · Cited by 7,552
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 · Cited by 7,326
How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003 · Cited by 3,990
BAİDOO-ANU, D., & OWUSU ANSAH, L. (2023) · Journal of AI · doi:10.61969/jai.1337500 · Cited by 3,939
Sallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 · Cited by 3,087
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/mrz8h · Cited by 3,079
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Aslam, 2023, Artificial intelligence applications using ChatGPT in education: Case studies and practices: Case studies and practices, IGI Global
- Calle, 2021, Proposal for the design and implementation of miranda: A chatbot-type recommender for supporting self-regulated learning in online environments, CEUR Workshop Proceedings
- Chukwuere, 2023, ChatGPT: The game changer for higher education institutions, Jozac Academic Voice, 3, 22
- Limo, 2023, Personalized tutoring: ChatGPT as a virtual tutor for personalized learning experiences, Przestrzen Spoleczna, 23, 292
- Muñoz, 2023, Examining the impacts of ChatGPT on student motivation and engagement, Przestrzen Spoleczna, 23, 1
- Muzurura, 2023, Application of artificial intelligence for virtual teaching assistance (case study: Introduction to information technology), International Research Journal of of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 10
- Siemens, 2005, Connectivism: A theory of learning for the digital age, International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 2, 1
- Tafrova-Grigorova, 2016, Historical roots and development of constructivism, Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 25, 75
- Yusup, 2023, Analysis of chatbot development for learning and teaching principles based on service efficiency: Chatbot development for learning and teaching, International Journal Of Computer Sciences and Mathematics Engineering, 2, 45
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nazaretsky, T., Mejia‐Domenzain, P., Swamy, V., Frej, J., & Käser, T. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100368 · Cited by 164
Ocen, S., Elasu, J., Aarakit, S. M., & Olupot, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1530247 · Cited by 157
Yang, L. (2026) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688261422129 · Cited by 52
Matsiola, M., Lappas, G., & Yannacopoulou, A. (2024) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc14120267 · Cited by 49
Uludağ, F., Kılıç, E., & Çelik, H. E. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05641-x · Cited by 41
“Similarly, Saihi et al. (2024) emphasized that PU and perceived ef fi cacy factors have strong positive effects on the intention to adopt AI chatbots, but concerns about “ trust and privacy, ” “ interaction, ” and “ information quality ” are evident.”
InfluentialJayasinghe, S., Gamage, K. A. A., Yang, D., Cheng, C., Disanayake, C., & Apeji, U. D. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010137 · Cited by 23
Faizin, N., Alfan, M., Basid, A., Ramadhan, M. R., Panatik, S. A., & Kawakip, A. N. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00767-1 · Cited by 11
“However, Saihi et al. stated that there are challenges related to trust, response bias, privacy, and information accuracy that are major problems [16], although recently this has begun to be unproven due to the perceived benefits and relatively acceptable content [22, 23].”
InfluentialPhuong, D. T. T., Silalahi, A. D. K., Chang, W., Tedjakusuma, A. P., & Eunike, I. J. (2025) · Business Strategy & Development · doi:10.1002/bsd2.70122 · Cited by 12
Cho, C., & Ofosu-Anim, D. O. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101418 · Cited by 18
Razzouki, M., Hammou, S. B., & Izenzal, M. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2553829 · Cited by 13
Soleimani, S., Farrokhnia, M., van Dijk, A., & Noroozi, O. (2025) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2025.2530767 · Cited by 26
“These studies have expanded TAM to include additional constructs relevant to GenAI, such as facilitating conditions (Cabero-Almenara et al., 2024; Saihi et al., 2024) and teachers’ intentions to use the technology (Hu et al., 2025), both of which are linked to perceived usefulness and ease of use.”
Just-in-Time News: An AI Chatbot for the Modern Information Age
Sufi, F. K. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6020022 · Cited by 11
Ali, I. M., & Arpacı, İ. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100681 · Cited by 8
Zhang, Q., Li, L., Xu, C., Qi, Y., & Zhao, X. (2025) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101244 · Cited by 9
Saihi, A., & Ahmed, V. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-026-00583-z · Cited by 8
“These constructs have been previously validated through a structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis confirming acceptable reliability and both convergent and discriminant validity (Saihi et al., 2024).”
InfluentialSelf-citationZahid, H., Danish, M., Ali, S., Huo, C., & Khalid, N. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2677727 · Cited by 8
Zhang, J., Pan, W., Liang, X., & Ge, J. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70209 · Cited by 10
Firm-Level Digitalization for Sustainability Performance: Evidence from Ningbo City of China
Shao, X., Ahmad, M., & Javed, F. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16208881 · Cited by 6
Joshi, S., Pandey, K., & Maheta, D. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2597051 · Cited by 7
“Effective adoption thus requires policies, training, and ethical frameworks that simultaneously build trust and reduce anxiety (Saihi et al., 2024).”
Yao, K., & Chiang, S. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13152390 · Cited by 6
Xiang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1790095 · Cited by 4
“Structural model research in related fields similarly indicates that factors like technological readiness and self-efficacy influence AI tool use and attitudes (Saihi et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2025).”
Sharma, D., Pareek, A., Noor, S., & Dey, S. K. (2025) · South Asian Journal of Management · doi:10.62206/sajm.32.1.2025.196-214 · Cited by 4
Primadasa, R., Kusrini, E., & Mansur, A. (2026) · Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s41660-025-00687-5 · Cited by 4
“Cronbach’s alpha val - ues ranged from 0.735 to 0.895, composite reliability from 0.839 to 0.914, and average variance extracted (AVE) from 0.467 to 0.693, meeting accepted thresholds for convergent validity and internal consistency (J. F. Hair et al. 2019 ; Saihi et al. 2024).”
InfluentialTowards a Sustainable and Ethical Integration of AI Chatbots in Higher Education
Voicu, M.-C., Sîrghi, N., Mircea, G., & Toth, D. M.-M. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18052534 · Cited by 3
Comparing lesson plan-driven and ask-me-anything chatbots: teaching a UNIX Shell course
Berengueres, J. O. L. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00492-9 · Cited by 3
Mwaniki, S., Araka, E., Kituku, B., & Maina, E. M. (2025) · IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) · doi:10.23919/ist-africa67297.2025.11060553 · Cited by 2
“First, GAI improves the flow of the lessons by engaging the students and giving them more opportunities to exercise their creativity and confidence at the set pace [3] [6].”
Qablan, A. M., Badawy, H. R. I., Badawy, H. R. I., & Maradian, P. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0573-8.ch002 · Cited by 3
Uso de IA para desarrollo de habilidades blandas: revisión sistemática de la literatura
Rosero-Mellizo, L. S., & Arias, A. M. (2026) · Revista Colombiana de Educación · doi:10.17227/rce.num98-22795 · Cited by 4
From chalkboards to chatbots: generative AI impact on education in emerging economies
Virmani, N., Sharma, D., Sahu, A., & Garza‐Reyes, J. A. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2632172 · Cited by 3
Li, W., & Wang, S. (2026) · International Journal of Distance Education Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijdet.411905 · Cited by 2
Deng, C., Zhang, Y., & Liao, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1842826 · Cited by 2
Owolabi, A. A., Ogunyemi, K., Onayemi, O., & Ikeolumba, J. (2025) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92916-8_7 · Cited by 1
Generating Change: AI as an Opportunity to Address Long-Standing OER Challenges
Anastasopoulos, I., & Pardos, Z. A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03873-9_1 · Cited by 1
Salim, R. R. M., Rahman, N. S. A., & Sahabudin, N. A. (2025) · International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) · doi:10.1109/icic68054.2025.11309593 · Cited by 1
Alshaher, A. A., & Alhayawwi, Z. A. A. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11524-9_9 · Cited by 1
Umri, N. A., Karnyoto, A. S., & Pardamean, B. B. (2025) · International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE) · doi:10.1109/icitisee68184.2025.11355145 · Cited by 3
“Explores how hallucinations shape critical thinking and memory [6], [25], [26].”
Yap, Y.-Y., Hooi, T. S., & Tan, B.-C. (2025) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computer · doi:10.1109/icetc66579.2025.11387548 · Cited by 1
“Past studies show students are more likely to use GenAI if they deem it helps their learning [6, 13].”
InfluentialRashid, S., & Malik, S. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2661437 · Cited by 1
Lee, C. T., & Pan, L.-Y. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2531280 · Cited by 2
“This aligns with the findings of Saihi et al. (2024) that the reliability of GenAI is positively related to efficiency.”
Bolatimi, O. S., Ricky-Okine, C., Bolatimi, F. E., Agbesi, C. C. M., Martey, F., Bolatimi, O. R., Peter, A., & Kwaku, E. O. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02082-6
“Lastly, predictive modelling of GenAI learning outcomes in the literature is dominated by regression and structural equation approaches [1, 52, 67], the application of multi-algorithm machine learning benchmarking combined with game-theoretic explainability frameworks such as SHAP, which is capable…”
Feng, P., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences · doi:10.2478/amns-2024-3622
Rodríguez, M. D. L. M. T., Sánchez, A. G., Manzo, J. C., Balderas, F. R., & Orea, W. A. M. (2024) · Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar · doi:10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i6.15131
Bautista, U. P. S. J., Mendoza, Y. S. F., Calle, C. A. P., Bautista, U. P. S. J., Ventura, M. D. R. G., Bautista, U. P. S. J., Donayre, J., & de Ica, U. N. S. L. G. (2024) · doi:10.59899/ges-cono-71-c19
Exploring the Integration of AI in Interactive Lesson Planning: A Study of Delhi NCR Teachers
Karthikeyan, P. (2025) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.50181 · Cited by 1
“In particular, AI tools such as chatbots, gamified learning platforms, augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR), adaptive learning systems, and AI-based content generators are increasingly used in interactive lesson planning and instructional delivery[2].”
Mapping AI in Social Sciences: A Bibliometric Study of Its Influence in Higher Education
Chhotu Kumar, Y. J. (2025) · European Economic Letters (EEL) · doi:10.52783/eel.v15i3.3504
AI-Assisted Language Assessment: Basis for Senior High School Language Arts Instruction Assessment
Campos-Marces, G. (2025) · Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.70838/pemj.430903
K, D. V. A. (2025) · International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology · doi:10.64643/ijirtv12i1-181732-459
Meng, X., & Li, L. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi65680.2025.11201143
al., H. E. (2025) · International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES · doi:10.21833/ijaas.2025.10.024
López, G. E. C., Reyes, J. U., & Reyes, E. C. (2025) · European Public & Social Innovation Review · doi:10.31637/epsir-2026-2155 · Cited by 3
Quiño-Justol, J., & Ungab, K. J. (2025) · Journal of interdisciplinary perspectives · doi:10.69569/jip.2025.686
Strategies for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Higher Education
Al‐Qaimari, G. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04788-5_14
Rajan, P. R. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-41660-6.00001-6 · Cited by 2
Smart Financial Learning: An Intelligent Agent with Chatbot Assistance
Sawant, S., Nampalliwar, S., Masand, A., & Negi, V. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06677-0_34
Chatbots-based Systematic Review for Student Learning and Engagement with LLMs
Rohini, S., & Sethukarasi, T. (2025) · International Conference on Intelligent Cyber Physical Systems and Internet of Things (ICoICI) · doi:10.1109/icoici65217.2025.11252629
“In the present day, these virtual assistants are often referred to as conversational agents or bots, and they are being used across various sectors, including banking, healthcare, and telecommunications customer support [2].”
Mao, P., Cai, Z., Luo, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Sun, X. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2589406
“…some individual factors (e.g. learning motivation, personal innovativeness) and social and contextual factors (e.g. social influence, accessibility) are closely associated with individuals’ behavioral intention and actual use of chat-bots (Mao et al., 2025; Saihi et al., 2024; Strzelecki, 2024a).”
Ninaquispe, J. C. M., Tocto, R. I. M., Jiménez, F. A. A., Rázuri-Rubio, H. H., Huatay, K. C. V., & Rivera, L. G. A. (2025) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4689-3_17
Research Methodology in Higher Education in Ecuador
Velastegui-Hernández, R.-S., Silva-Chávez, J., Espinoza-Álvarez, E., Jordán-Sánchez, J., Chérrez, E. D. L. Á. H., & Ases, M. J. M. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98890-5_15
WIP: An AI-Based Virtual Assistant for Supporting a Large Engineering Course
Gupta, D., Camba, J. D., Fuerst, T., & Zhou, J. (2025) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie63693.2025.11328408
“…framework, and data will be analyzed using structural equation modeling to determine the contribution of constructs like performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions on the intention to use the chatbot in the future [7], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22].”
Nathanael, E. G., Prasetyo, S. S., & Mailangkay, A. B. L. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Technological Solutions (ICAITech) · doi:10.1109/icaitech66481.2025.11387592
“In addition, prior familiarity with AI programs and trying out chatbot technology affects how much the students accept it [9].”
Gupta, S., Agarwal, A., Iyer, V., & Arya, P. K. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2754-586520260000005006
Rodríguez, N. P. V., Cárdenas, A. Z. M., Saldarreaga, J. M. V., Cabezas, L. E. P., & Paca, M. D. J. G. (2026) · Perspectiva XXI · doi:10.70577/0fedh726
Yapay Zekâ Araçlarının Kullanımına İlişkin Akademisyenlerin Deneyim ve Değerlendirmeleri
Yıldızgörür, M. R., & Salman, G. (2026) · SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ İLETİŞİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİK DERGİSİ · doi:10.18094/josc.1698969
Zúñiga, S. P. A., Zúñiga, S. P. A., & Sandoval, M. J. I. (2026) · Papeles · doi:10.54104/papeles.v18n35.2317
“A pesar de estos retos, la IA se posiciona como una herramienta clave para fomentar métodos educativos más efectivos en la era pospandemia, alineándose con tendencias globales hacia la innovación pedagógica (Alhwaiti, 2023; Saihi et al., 2024).”
Dwivedi, R. K., Calzada, I., & Rampriyan, S. (2026) · Journal of Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1142/s0219649226500164
How Digital Literacy Affects AI Literacy Among Preservice Teachers: Media Literacy as a Moderator
YİĞİT, M. F. (2026) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.26.59.13.4
Younes, M. T., & Ali, M. H. (2026) · International Symposium on AI-Driven Engineering Systems (ISADES) · doi:10.1109/isades69945.2026.11608174
Kadırhan, Z. (2026) · Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1696829
Erin, Warnars, H. L. H. S., Kurniawan, Y., Sfenrianto, & Prabowo, H. (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Next-Gen Healthcare Systems (IEHNS) · doi:10.1109/iehns68708.2026.11607207
Diaz, M. S. T., Facundo, J. F. L., & Pascuas-Rengifo, Y. S. (2026) · trilogía Ciencia Tecnología Sociedad · doi:10.22430/21457778.3906
Singh, M. I., Pradhan, S., Naveen, S., & Vinod, L. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-02090-9
“Trust in AI has been shown to depend on users' understanding of the system, their self-efficacy, and their sense that the system is beneficial rather than threatening [46, 52, 55].”
KELEŞ, N. Ö., & Koç, B. (2026) · Yuksekogretim Dergisi · doi:10.53478/yuksekogretim.1714038
Vasileva, V., Reiser, T., & Jürjens, J. (2026) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2026f3410
Javed, S., Firmin, S., & Maroulis, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10351087/v1
Dehouche, N., & Wei, X. (2026) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2026.e45640
Salim, R. M., Rahman, N. S. A., Sahabudin, N. A., & Sembiring, R. W. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icitce70363.2026.11741419
Metadata
- Authors
- Saihi, A., Ben-Daya, M., Hariga, M., & As'ad, R.
- Affiliations
- American University of Sharjah (AE)
- Corresponding author
- Saihi, Afef
- Venue
- Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 100274
- ISSN
- 2666-920X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401295314
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 242
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 28.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- generative AI chatbots, technology adoption, higher education, students, educators, trust in AI, privacy concerns, response bias, information accuracy, technological competence, gender differences, user roles, artificial intelligence in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
