The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital rock physics benchmarks—part II: Computing effective properties
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Numerical Calculation of Time-Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface
Harlow, F. H., & Welch, J. E. (1965) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.1761178 · Cited by 5,977
Ladd, A. J. C. (1994) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112094001771 · Cited by 2,461
The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media
Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., & Dvorkin, J. (2011) · Cited by 2,367
Self-citationLadd, A. J. C. (1994) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112094001783 · Cited by 1,195
Sen, P. N., Scala, C., & Cohen, M. H. (1981) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.1441215 · Cited by 1,070
Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems
Chopard, B., & Droz, M. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511549755 · Cited by 1,043
Martys, N. S., & Chen, H. (1996) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.53.743 · Cited by 892
Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_60229 · Cited by 870
Wiegmann, A., & Bube, K. P. (2000) · SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1137/s0036142997328664 · Cited by 277
Self-citationLattice Gas Methods For Partial Differential Equations
Doolen, G. D. (2019) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429032738 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Bultreys, T., De Boever, W., & Cnudde, V. (2016) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.001 · Cited by 474
Versatile and efficient pore network extraction method using marker-based watershed segmentation
Gostick, J. T. (2017) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.96.023307 · Cited by 423
Laubach, S. E., Lander, R. H., Criscenti, L. J., Anovitz, L. M., Urai, J. L., Pollyea, R. M., Hooker, J. N., Narr, W., Evans, M. A., Kerisit, S. N., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2019rg000671 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrä, H., Combaret, N., Dvorkin, J., Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M., Keehm, Y., Krzikalla, F., Lee, M., Madonna, C., Marsh, M., Mukerji, T., Saenger, E. H., Sain, R., Saxena, N., Ricker, S., Wiegmann, A., & Zhan, X.
- Venue
- Computers & Geosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 33-43
- ISSN
- 0098-3004 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042650924
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital rock physics benchmarks—part II: Computing effective properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.008
- The paper
- Andrä, H., Combaret, N., Dvorkin, J., Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M., Keehm, Y., Krzikalla, F., Lee, M., Madonna, C., Marsh, M., Mukerji, T., Saenger, E. H., Sain, R., Saxena, N., Ricker, S., Wiegmann, A., & Zhan, X. (2013). Digital rock physics benchmarks—part II: Computing effective properties. Computers & Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.