The DOI matches its Crossref record; 141 of the 141 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioavailability of phytochemicals and its enhancement by drug delivery systems
Open accessAbstract
Issues of poor oral bioavailability of cancer chemopreventives have hindered progress in cancer prevention. Novel delivery systems that modulate the pharmacokinetics of existing drugs, such as nanoparticles, cyclodextrins, niosomes, liposomes and implants, could be used to enhance the delivery of chemopreventive agents to target sites. The development of new approaches in prevention and treatment of cancer could encompass new delivery systems for approved and newly investigated compounds. In this review, we discuss some of the delivery approaches that have already made an impact by either delivering a drug to target tissue or increasing its bioavailability by many fold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel
Nel, A., Xia, T., Mädler, L., & Li, N. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114397 · Cited by 9,324
Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability
Manach, C., Scalbert, A., Morand, C., Rémésy, C., & Jiménez, L. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/79.5.727 · Cited by 8,175
Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system
CHOI, D. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90162-6 · Cited by 7,972
Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review
Maeda, H., Wu, J., Sawa, T., Matsumura, Y., & Hori, K. (2000) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00248-5 · Cited by 6,565
(1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199404143301501 · Cited by 4,737
Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance
Kataoka, K., Harada, A., & Nagasaki, Y. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00124-1 · Cited by 3,506
Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue
Panyam, J., & Labhasetwar, V. (2003) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00228-4 · Cited by 3,361
Stimuli-reponsive polymers and their bioconjugates
GIL, E., & HUDSON, S. (2004) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.003 · Cited by 2,385
Nanoparticle and targeted systems for cancer therapy
Brannon-Peppas, L., & Blanchette, J. O. (2004) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.02.014 · Cited by 2,334
Cited by
Ghosh, S., Basu, S., Anbarasu, A., & Ramaiah, S. (2025) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.8365 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Aqil, F., Munagala, R., Jeyabalan, J., & Vadhanam, M. V.
- Venue
- Cancer Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-141
- ISSN
- 0304-3835 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070110861
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 141
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioavailability of phytochemicals and its enhancement by drug delivery systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.02.032
- The paper
- Aqil, F., Munagala, R., Jeyabalan, J., & Vadhanam, M. V. (2013). Bioavailability of phytochemicals and its enhancement by drug delivery systems. Cancer Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.02.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
