Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals produced under different hydrolysis conditions: Properties and morphological features

Open access
Vasconcelos, Niédja Fittipaldi, Feitosa, Judith Pessoa Andrade, da Gama, Francisco Miguel Portela, Morais, João Paulo Saraiva, Andrade, Fábia Karine, de Souza Filho, Men de Sá Moreira, Rosa, Morsyleide de Freitas·2017·Carbohydrate Polymers

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.090

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Vasconcelos, N. F., Feitosa, J. P. A., da Gama, F. M. P., Morais, J. P. S., Andrade, F. K., de Souza Filho, M. D. S. M., & Rosa, M. D. F.
Venue
Carbohydrate Polymers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
155
Pages
425-431
ISSN
0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2511223310
Cited by
361
References
36
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals produced under different hydrolysis conditions: Properties and morphological features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.090
The paper
Vasconcelos, N. F., Feitosa, J. P. A., da Gama, F. M. P., Morais, J. P. S., Andrade, F. K., de Souza Filho, M. D. S. M., & Rosa, M. D. F. (2017). Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals produced under different hydrolysis conditions: Properties and morphological features. Carbohydrate Polymers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.090

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.