Cited by 103Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsMesoporous Materials and Catalysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chitosan-glucuronic acid conjugate coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles: A smart pH-responsive and receptor-targeted system for colorectal cancer therapy

Abstract

Glycosylated pH-sensitive mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) of capecitabine (CAP) were developed for targeting colorectal cancer. The MSNs possessed an average pore diameter of 8.12 ± 0.43 nm, pore volume of 0.73 ± 0.21 cm 3/g, and particle size of 245.24 ± 5.75 nm. A high loading of 180.51 ± 5.23 mg/g attributed to the larger pore volume was observed. The surface of the drug-loaded MSNs were capped with chitosan-glucuronic acid (CHS-GCA) conjugate to combine two strategies viz. pH-sensitive, and lectin receptor mediated uptake. In vitro studies demonstrated a pH-sensitive and controlled release of CAP which was further enhanced in the presence of rat caecal content. Higher uptake of the (CAP-MSN)CHS-GCA was observed in HCT 116 cell lines. The glycosylated nanoparticles revealed reduction in the tumors, aberrant crypt foci, dysplasia and inflammation, and alleviation in the toxic features. This illustrated that the nanoparticles showed promising antitumor efficacy with reduced toxicity and may be used as a effective carrier against cancer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117893

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Narayan, R., Gadag, S., Cheruku, S. P., Raichur, A. M., Day, C. M., Garg, S., Manandhar, S., Pai, K. S. R., Suresh, A., Mehta, C. H., Nayak, Y., Kumar, N., & Nayak, U. Y.
Affiliations
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Nayak, Usha Yogendra
Venue
Carbohydrate Polymers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
261
Pages
117893
ISSN
0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135707793
Cited by
103
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 8
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Carbohydrate Polymers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (acceptedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Keywords
mesoporous silica nanoparticles, capecitabine, colorectal cancer, pH-responsive drug delivery, receptor-targeted drug delivery, controlled drug release, HCT116 cells, tumor growth inhibition, aberrant crypt foci, dysplasia, inflammation
MeSH terms
Capecitabine, Animals, Cell Survival, Delayed-Action Preparations, Drug Carriers, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Particle Size, Silicon Dioxide, Colorectal Neoplasms, Porosity, Drug Delivery Systems, Rats, Wistar, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Glucuronic Acid, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, HCT116 Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Chitosan, Rats, Nanoparticles, Drug Liberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review