The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Effectiveness of Telemonitoring Versus Usual Care for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of telemonitoring (TM) in the management of patients with heart failure (HF).Methods and results We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials published through May 2016. Outcomes of interest included clinical effectiveness (mortality, hospitalization, and emergency department visits) and patient-reported outcomes. TM was defined as the transmission of individual biologic data, such as weight, blood pressure, and heart rate. Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials (9582 patients) of TM met the inclusion criteria: 24 studies on all-cause mortality, 17 studies on all-cause hospitalization, 12 studies on HF-related hospitalization, and 5 studies on HF-related mortality. The risks of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.94) and HF-related mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.91) were significantly lower in the TM group than in the usual care group. TM showed a significant benefit when ≥3 biologic data are transmitted or when transmission occurred daily. TM also reduced mortality risk in studies that monitored patients' symptoms, medication adherence, or prescription changes.Conclusions TM intervention reduces the mortality risk in patients with HF, and intensive monitoring with more frequent transmissions of patient data increases its effectiveness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, these previous reviews have often focused on a specific type of telemedicine, a specific outcome, and/or a specific comparator, which calls for a more comprehensive and inclusive systematic review seeking to compare and synthesize findings for treatment outcomes while adjusting for different study characteristics.”
From The Effectiveness of Telemedicine Solutions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure
Chaudhry, S. I., Mattera, J. A., Curtis, J. P., Spertus, J. A., Herrin, J., Lin, Z., Phillips, C. O., Hodshon, B. V., Cooper, L. S., & Krumholz, H. M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1010029 · Cited by 1,232
More ‘Malignant’ Than Cancer? Five-Year Survival Following a First Admission for Heart Failure
Stewart, S., Macintyre, K., Hole, D. J., Capewell, S., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2001) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00141-0 · Cited by 1,049
Koehler, F., Winkler, S., Schieber, M., Sechtem, U., Stangl, K., Böhm, M., Boll, H., Baumann, G., Honold, M., Koehler, K., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.018473 · Cited by 716
Cleland, J. G. F., Louis, A. A., Rigby, A. S., Janssens, U., & Balk, A. H. M. M. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.050 · Cited by 700
Ong, M. K., Romano, P. S., Edgington, S., Aronow, H. U., Auerbach, A. D., Black, J. T., De Marco, T., Escarce, J. J., Evangelista, L. S., Hanna, B., et al. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7712 · Cited by 695
Clark, R. A., Inglis, S. C., McAlister, F. A., Cleland, J. G. F., & Stewart, S. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39156.536968.55 · Cited by 672
Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure
Inglis, S. C., Clark, R. A., Dierckx, R., Prieto-Merino, D., & Cleland, J. G. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007228.pub3 · Cited by 453
Ryu, S. (2012) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2012.18.2.153 · Cited by 422
Goldberg, L. R., Piette, J. D., Walsh, M. N., Frank, T. A., Jaski, B. E., Smith, A. L., Rodriguez, R., MANCINI, D. M., Hopton, L. A., Orav, E. J., et al. (2003) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00393-4 · Cited by 366
Mobile Phone-Based Telemonitoring for Heart Failure Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Seto, E., Leonard, K. J., Cafazzo, J. A., Barnsley, J., Masino, C., & Ross, H. J. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1909 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rossignol, P., Hernandez, A. F., Solomon, S. D., & Zannad, F. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31808-7 · Cited by 316
Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
McDonagh, S. T. J., Dalal, H. M., Moore, S. F., Clark, C. E., Dean, S. G., Jolly, K. B., Cowie, A., Afzal, J., & Taylor, R. S. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007130.pub5 · Cited by 171
Telemonitoring Versus Standard Care in Heart Failure: A Randomised Multicentre Trial
Galinier, M., Roubille, F., Berdagué, P., Brierre, G., Cantié, P., Dary, P., Ferradou, J., Fondard, O., Labarre, J. P., Mansourati, J., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1906 · Cited by 149
Mobile Phone Apps to Support Heart Failure Self-Care Management: Integrative Review
Athilingam, P. R., & Jenkins, B. (2018) · JMIR Cardio · doi:10.2196/10057 · Cited by 113
Ware, P., Ross, H. J., Cafazzo, J. A., Laporte, A., Gordon, K., & Seto, E. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/10768 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Yun, J. E., Park, J.-E., Park, H.-Y., Lee, H.-Y., & Park, D.-A.
- Affiliations
- National Evidenc- based healthcare Collaborating Agency (KR)
- Korea National Institute of Health (KR)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Dong-Ah
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiac Failure
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-28
- ISSN
- 1071-9164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2754484825
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cardiac Failure (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency in Republic of Korea (NS15-001)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- remote patient monitoring, heart failure, all-cause mortality, emergency department visits, patient-reported outcomes, medication adherence, usual care comparison
- MeSH terms
- Emergency Service, Hospital, Heart Failure, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
