Cited by 672Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Clark, Robyn A, Inglis, Sally C, McAlister, Finlay A, Cleland, John G F, Stewart, Simon·2007·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether remote monitoring (structured telephone support or telemonitoring) without regular clinic or home visits improves outcomes for patients with chronic heart failure. DATA SOURCES: 15 electronic databases, hand searches of previous studies, and contact with authors and experts. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently screened the results. REVIEW METHODS: Published randomised controlled trials comparing remote monitoring programmes with usual care in patients with chronic heart failure managed within the community. RESULTS: 14 randomised controlled trials (4264 patients) of remote monitoring met the inclusion criteria: four evaluated telemonitoring, nine evaluated structured telephone support, and one evaluated both. Remote monitoring programmes reduced the rates of admission to hospital for chronic heart failure by 21% (95% confidence interval 11% to 31%) and all cause mortality by 20% (8% to 31%); of the six trials evaluating health related quality of life three reported significant benefits with remote monitoring, and of the four studies examining healthcare costs with structured telephone support three reported reduced cost and one no effect. CONCLUSION: Programmes for chronic heart failure that include remote monitoring have a positive effect on clinical outcomes in community dwelling patients with chronic heart failure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.39156.536968.55

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, R. A., Inglis, S. C., McAlister, F. A., Cleland, J. G. F., & Stewart, S.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Simon
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-04-10
Volume
334
Issue
7600
Pages
942
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1985760052
Cited by
672
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 45
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Alberta
  • European Commission
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • National Institute of Clinical Studies
  • University of South Australia
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
chronic heart failure, remote patient monitoring, remote monitoring, hospital readmission, all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life, health care costs, community-dwelling patients, usual care
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Telephone, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review