Cited by 231Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Telemonitoring for Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

Open access
Chaudhry, Sarwat I., Phillips, Christopher O., Stewart, Simon S., Riegel, Barbara, Mattera, Jennifer A., Jerant, Anthony F., Krumholz, Harlan M.·2007·Journal of Cardiac Failure

Abstract

Background Telemonitoring, the use of communication technology to remotely monitor health status, is an appealing strategy for improving disease management.Methods and results We searched Medline databases, bibliographies, and spoke with experts to review the evidence on telemonitoring in heart failure patients. Interventions included: telephone-based symptom monitoring (n = 5), automated monitoring of signs and symptoms (n = 1), and automated physiologic monitoring (n = 1). Two studies directly compared effectiveness of 2 or more forms of telemonitoring. Study quality and intervention type varied considerably. Six studies suggested reduction in all-cause and heart failure hospitalizations (14% to 55% and 29% to 43%, respectively) or mortality (40% to 56%) with telemonitoring. Of the 3 negative studies, 2 enrolled low-risk patients and patients with access to high quality care, whereas 1 enrolled a very high-risk Hispanic population. Studies comparing forms of telemonitoring demonstrated similar effectiveness. However, intervention costs were higher with more complex programs (8383 dollars per patient per year) versus less complex programs (1695 dollars per patient per year).Conclusion The evidence base for telemonitoring in heart failure is currently quite limited. Based on the available data, telemonitoring may be an effective strategy for disease management in high-risk heart failure patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.09.001

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaudhry, S. I., Phillips, C. O., Stewart, S. S., Riegel, B., Mattera, J. A., Jerant, A. F., & Krumholz, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
56-62
ISSN
1071-9164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001025430
Cited by
231
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG030986)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL080228)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, chronic heart failure, heart failure hospitalization, mortality, intervention costs, high-risk patients, Hispanic patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review