Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metal-organic frameworks for photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible radiation: A review of strategies and applications

Alkhatib, Ismail Issa, Garlisi, Corrado, Pagliaro, Mario, Al-Ali, Khalid, Palmisano, Giovanni·2020·Catalysis Today

Abstract

Abstract Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged over the last decades as an interesting class of materials for a plethora of applications due to their flexible tunability in composition, structure and functional properties. In particular, the urgent need to convert CO2 into useful chemical substances have led to growing attention towards these catalysts as promising candidates for CO2 capture and storage with the ultimate aim of promoting sustainable pathways to address energy and environmental problems. This review provides an overview of the fundamental factors and recent studies of MOFs for CO2 photoreduction, pointing out the main strategies adopted in the design and testing of innovative MOFs-based catalysts, where MOFs serve either directly as the only photoactive materials for CO2 transformation into chemical fuels or as units of hybrid catalytic arrangements to enhance CO2 conversion. The functionalization of MOFs is a promising approach to improve their photocatalytic activity. Their absorption of visible light can be enhanced either by modification of MOFs structure or by adjusting the organic ligands to contain reactive functional groups, through the inclusion of metal nodes with higher reduction potential, or even through a combination of both strategies. MOFs can also be used as co-catalysts along with other photocatalytic entities, resulting in MOF-based composites with enhanced CO2 photoreduction. The performance of MOFs-based photocatalysts is analyzed in this review, with a view to emphasizing not only the advantages but also the limitations, over the more traditional semiconductors photocatalysts. At the current stage, the main challenges of these MOFs-based photocatalysts relate to the economic feasibility of industrial-scale processes and to the poor stability of these materials, which is often lost after some runs. It is hoped that this review will help the design of increasingly efficient MOF-based materials for CO2 reduction and create the needed awareness that more work is still needed in order to be able to actualize and explore the potentials of MOFs in addressing the key issues of environmental sustainability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.09.032

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Alkhatib, I. I., Garlisi, C., Pagliaro, M., Al-Ali, K., & Palmisano, G.
Venue
Catalysis Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
340
Pages
209-224
ISSN
0920-5861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896240940
Cited by
284
References
100
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metal-organic frameworks for photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible radiation: A review of strategies and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.09.032
The paper
Alkhatib, I. I., Garlisi, C., Pagliaro, M., Al-Ali, K., & Palmisano, G. (2020). Metal-organic frameworks for photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible radiation: A review of strategies and applications. Catalysis Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.09.032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.