The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cyclic peptide therapeutics: past, present and future
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Macrocyclic Peptides as Drug Candidates: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges
Vinogradov, A. A., Yin, Y., & Suga, H. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b13178 · Cited by 848
E3 Ligase Ligands for PROTACs: How They Were Found and How to Discover New Ones
Ishida, T., & Ciulli, A. (2021) · SLAS Discovery · doi:10.1177/2472555220965528 · Cited by 380
Cyclic peptide drugs approved in the last two decades (2001–2021)
Zhang, H., & Chen, S. (2022) · RSC Chemical Biology · doi:10.1039/d1cb00154j · Cited by 319
Antimicrobial peptides towards clinical application: Delivery and formulation
Wang, C., Hong, T., Cui, P., Wang, J., & Xia, J. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.028 · Cited by 281
Systemic delivery of peptides by the oral route: Formulation and medicinal chemistry approaches
Brayden, D. J., Hill, T. A., Fairlie, D. P., Maher, S., & Mrsny, R. J. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.05.007 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Zorzi, A., Deyle, K., & Heinis, C.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 38
- Pages
- 24-29
- ISSN
- 1367-5931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2594502287
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyclic peptide therapeutics: past, present and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.02.006
- The paper
- Zorzi, A., Deyle, K., & Heinis, C. (2017). Cyclic peptide therapeutics: past, present and future. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.02.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
