Cited by 115Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA Research and SplicingHeat shock proteins research

Intrinsically disordered proteins and biomolecular condensates as drug targets

Open access
Biesaga, Mateusz, Frigolé-Vivas, Marta, Salvatella, Xavier·2021·Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered domains represent attractive therapeutic targets because they play key roles in cancer, as well as in neurodegenerative and infectious diseases. They are, however, considered undruggable because they do not form stable binding pockets for small molecules and, therefore, have not been prioritized in drug discovery. Under physiological solution conditions many biomedically relevant intrinsically disordered proteins undergo phase separation processes leading to the formation of mesoscopic highly dynamic assemblies, generally known as biomolecular condensates that define environments that can be quite different from the solutions surrounding them. In what follows, we review key recent findings in this area and show how biomolecular condensation can offer opportunities for modulating the activities of intrinsically disordered targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.02.009

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biesaga, M., Frigolé-Vivas, M., & Salvatella, X.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Research in Biomedicine (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Salvatella, Xavier
Venue
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
62
Pages
90-100
ISSN
1367-5931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3149136862
Cited by
115
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, biomolecular condensates, phase separation, undruggable targets, drug discovery, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, infectious diseases, liquid-liquid phase separation, protein condensates
MeSH terms
Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Protein Binding, Pyrimidines, Structure-Activity Relationship, Thermodynamics, 1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-Methylpiperazine, Transition Temperature, Phase Transition, Protein Multimerization, Drug Discovery, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review