Cited by 5Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDigital Mental Health Interventions

Development and Preliminary Feasibility Testing of a Decision Support Tool for Childhood Anxiety Treatment

Open access
Lindhiem, Oliver, Bennett, Charles B., Beidas, Rinad S., Grasso, Damion J., Sakolsky, Dara J., Druzdzel, Marek J.·2018·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Abstract

In this practical application, we describe the steps to build a decision-support tool using GeNIe 2.1 software. The method incorporates principles of decision analyses and allows for a systematic strategy to balance treatment efficacy data with patient preferences. We illustrate the utility for helping clinicians and patients choose between two or more efficacious treatment options (CBT, medication, or their combination). Preliminary pilot data from families (n = 5) seeking services at a specialty clinic for childhood anxiety disorders support the usability of the tool and high patient satisfaction. We use case examples and sample graphical output to illustrate how the decision-support system can be used to integrate data on, 1) baseline symptom severity 2) the relative effectiveness of two or more treatment options, and 3) patient preferences and values, to arrive at a personalized treatment recommendation. The decision-support tool enabled child and parent preferences to be explicitly stated and facilitated discussions about how best to incorporate their preferences into an evidenced-based treatment strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2017.07.002

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medications can serve as a viable option for children who do not respond to psychotherapy or to enhance clinical outcomes after psychotherapy has concluded.

    “Furthermore, medications can serve as a viable option for children who do not respond to psychotherapy or to enhance clinical outcomes after psychotherapy has concluded [72].”

    From The risks versus the benefits of pharmacological intervention in social anxiety disorder in children (2025) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Shared Decision Making section identifies medication and combination treatment as evidence-based options for children seeking mental health care. The Discussion mentions sequential monotherapy followed by combination treatment, but does not say that medication improves outcomes after psychotherapy has concluded or specifically recommend it for psychotherapy nonresponders. In the Case Examples section, a teen who had not improved after six CBT sessions instead continued CBT. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindhiem, O., Bennett, C. B., Beidas, R. S., Grasso, D. J., Sakolsky, D. J., & Druzdzel, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Lindhiem, Oliver
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
199-207
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2737757964
Cited by
5
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL101066)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH093508, K23MH099179)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
decision support system, childhood anxiety disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, treatment selection, patient preferences, personalized treatment recommendations, decision analysis, parental preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review