Cited by 39Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Lessons learned conducting dialectical behavior therapy via telehealth in the age of COVID-19

Open access
Zalewski, Maureen, Walton, Carla J., Rizvi, Shireen L., White, Andrew W., Gamache Martin, Christina, O'Brien, Jacqueline R., Dimeff, Linda·2021·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Abstract

Given the severity and suicide risk of patients typically treated by Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and the absence of guidelines regarding delivery of DBT via telehealth, it is crucial that the DBT treatment community gather and rapidly disseminate information about effective strategies for delivering DBT via telehealth. The current study surveyed DBT providers (N = 200) to understand challenges and lessons learned as they transitioned to conducting DBT via telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Open-ended responses to challenges and lessons-learned were coded. Most frequently noted challenges were Therapy-Interfering Behaviors and elements related to the provision of Individual Therapy and Skills Training Group. The majority of providers offered advice for implementing group skills training, avoiding or overcoming therapist burnout, and emphasized continued adherence to treatment principles, even in the context of this new treatment modality. Overall, this qualitative study marks a starting point on identifying best practices delivering DBT via telehealth for which it is anticipated that clinical recommendations in this area will evolve, informed by clinician, researcher, and consumer input.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.02.005

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses of DBT-SG studies highlight its efficacy as a stand-alone treatment for a variety of mental health concerns such as depression, mood disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, eating disorders, ADHD, and BPD.

    “Importantly, meta-analyses of DBT-SG studies highlight its efficacy as a stand-alone treatment in treating a variety of mental health concerns such as depression and other mood disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, eating disorders, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, BPD, with implementation in variety of clinical settings, such as prisons or medium security settings, community or”

    From Can dialectical behavior therapy skills group treat social anxiety disorder? A brief integrative review (2024) · cites this paper as Zalewski et al., 2021

    The DBT Modes of Treatment section describes skills-training groups as one component of DBT, while the Results report providers’ ratings of groups delivered via telehealth. Neither passage reports meta-analyses or evaluates DBT skills groups as a stand-alone treatment for the listed conditions (searched for stand-alone skills training, meta-analyses, and the named disorders). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zalewski, M., Walton, C. J., Rizvi, S. L., White, A. W., Gamache Martin, C., O'Brien, J. R., & Dimeff, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Zalewski, Maureen
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
573-587
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154205983
Cited by
39
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, individual psychotherapy, therapist burnout, medication adherence, suicide risk, lessons learned

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review