Cited by 30Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersNeonatal Health and Biochemistry

Evaluation of interference from hemoglobin C, D, E and S traits on measurements of hemoglobin A1c by fifteen methods

Open access
Rohlfing, Curt, Hanson, Steven, Estey, Mathew P., Bordeleau, Pierre, Little, Randie R.·2021·Clinica Chimica Acta

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin C, D Punjab, E or S trait can interfere with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) results. We assessed whether they affect results obtained with 15 current assay methods. METHODS: Hemoglobin AA (HbAA), HbAC, HbAD Punjab, HbAE and HbAS samples were analyzed on 2 enzymatic, 4 ion-exchange HPLC and 9 immunoassay methods. Trinity Premier Hb9210 boronate affinity HPLC was the comparative method. An overall test of coincidence of least-squared linear regression lines was performed to determine if HbA1c results were statistically significantly different from those of HbAA samples. Clinically significant interference was defined as >6% difference from HbAA at 6 or 9% HbA1c compared to Premier Hb9210 using Deming regression. RESULTS: All methods showed statistically significant effects for one or more variants. Clinically significant effects were observed for the Tosoh G11 variant mode (HbAD), Roche b 101 (HbAC and HbAE) and Siemens DCA Vantage (HbAE and HbAS). All other methods (Beckman Coulter B93009 and B00389 on DxC700AU, and Unicel DxC, Ortho Clinical Vitros 5.1, Roche cobas c 513, Siemens Dimension RxL and Vista, and Enzymatic on Advia and Atellica, Tosoh G8 5.24 and 5.28, and GX) showed no clinically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: A few methods showed interference from one or more variants. Laboratories need to be aware of potential HbA1c assay interferences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cca.2021.07.027

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several hemoglobin variants and chemically modified derivatives of hemoglobin interfere with some assay methods.

    “Several hemoglobin variants (e.g., hemoglobins S, C, D, and E) and chemically modified derivatives of hemoglobin interfere with some assay methods (independent of any effects due to shortened RBC survival) (348-350) (for a review, see reference 347).”

    From Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (2023) · cites this paper as [349]

    The Introduction identifies method-specific interference from hemoglobin S, C, D, and E traits, and the Results report clinically significant interference for some assays. The paper does not address interference from chemically modified hemoglobin derivatives. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]International Diabetes Federation, Diabetes Atlas 9th Edition, 2019, https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/sections/worldwide-toll-of-diabetes.html, (accessed 16 December 2020).
  2. [6]World Health Organization, Use of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, Abbreviated Report of a WHO Consultation, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2011. https://www.who.int/diabetes/publications/report-hba1c_2011.pdf?ua=1. 26158184

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rohlfing, C., Hanson, S., Estey, M. P., Bordeleau, P., & Little, R. R.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Rohlfing, Curt
Venue
Clinica Chimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
522
Pages
31-35
ISSN
0009-8981 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3188638401
Cited by
30
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • University of Missouri
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
Keywords
hemoglobin C, hemoglobin D Punjab, hemoglobin E, hemoglobin S, HbA1c, assay interference, ion-exchange HPLC, immunoassay, enzyme activity assay, diabetes monitoring
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Hematologic Tests, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hemoglobin C, Humans, Immunoassay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review