Cited by 383Advanced Breast Cancer TherapiesPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 92 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors: The Mechanism of Action May Not Be as Simple as Once Thought

Open access

Abstract

CDK4/6 inhibitors are among a new generation of therapeutics. Building upon the striking success of the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and the hormone receptor antagonist letrozole in breast cancer, many other combinations have recently entered clinical trials in multiple diseases. To achieve maximal benefit with CDK4/6 inhibitors it will be critical to understand the cellular mechanisms by which they act. Here we highlight the mechanisms by which CDK4/6 inhibitors can exert their anti-tumor activities beyond simply enforcing cytostatic growth arrest, and discuss how this knowledge may inform new combinations, improve outcomes, and modify dosing schedules in the future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.023

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 92 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 58 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 28
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 5
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitor action observed in preclinical models are relevant to their clinical effects in human cancers.

    “Here we highlight the mechanisms by which CDK4/6 inhibitors can exert their anti-tumor activities beyond simply enforcing cytostatic growth arrest and discuss how this knowledge may inform new combinations, improve outcomes and modify dosing schedules in the future.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The senescence and SASP programs induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors in model systems are representative of those in human tumors.

    “Collectively, these observations suggest that the most effective approach to harness the senescence promoting effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors may be to first induce senescence and then eliminate the persistent senescent cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rb-negative tumors do not respond significantly to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

    “Given the importance of CDK4 in the tumor microenvironment, it may be somewhat surprising that CDK4/6 inhibitors have no significant effect on Rb-negative tumors.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 70 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 383

Metadata

Authors
Klein, M. E., Kovatcheva, M., Davis, L. E., Tap, W. D., & Koff, A.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Koff, Andrew
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
9-20
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799372852
Cited by
378
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 16
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748, CA140146)
  • Sarcoma Foundation of America
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
CDK4/6 inhibitors, cyclin-dependent kinases, mechanism of action, breast cancer, letrozole, combination therapy, anticancer activity, dosing regimen
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Neoplasms, Drug Design, Signal Transduction, Cellular Senescence, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Cell Cycle Checkpoints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review