Cited by 106Genetic factors in colorectal cancerCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Improved detection of colibactin-induced mutations by genotoxic E. coli in organoids and colorectal cancer

Open access
Rosendahl Huber, Axel, Pleguezuelos-Manzano, Cayetano, Puschhof, Jens, Ubels, Joske, Boot, Charelle, Saftien, Aurelia, Verheul, Mark, Trabut, Laurianne T. +9 more·2024·Cancer Cell

Abstract

Co-culture of intestinal organoids with a colibactin-producing pks + E. coli strain (EcC) revealed mutational signatures also found in colorectal cancer (CRC). E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) remains a commonly used probiotic, despite harboring the pks operon and inducing double strand DNA breaks. We determine the mutagenicity of EcN and three CRC-derived pks + E. coli strains with an analytical framework based on sequence characteristic of colibactin-induced mutations. All strains, including EcN, display varying levels of mutagenic activity. Furthermore, a machine learning approach attributing individual mutations to colibactin reveals that patients with colibactin-induced mutations are diagnosed at a younger age and that colibactin can induce a specific APC mutation. These approaches allow the sensitive detection of colibactin-induced mutations in ∼12% of CRC genomes and even in whole exome sequencing data, representing a crucial step toward pinpointing the mutagenic activity of distinct pks + E. coli strains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.02.009

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Buc, E., Dubois, D., Sauvanet, P., Raisch, J., Delmas, J., Darfeuille- Michaud, A., Pezet, D., and Bonnet, R. (2013). High prevalence of mu- cosa-associated E. coli producing cyclomodulin and genotoxin in colon cancer. PLoS One 8, e56964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0056964. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosendahl Huber, A., Pleguezuelos-Manzano, C., Puschhof, J., Ubels, J., Boot, C., Saftien, A., Verheul, M., Trabut, L. T., Groenen, N., van Roosmalen, M., Ouyang, K. S., Wood, H., Quirke, P., Meijer, G., Cuppen, E., Clevers, H., & van Boxtel, R.
Affiliations
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
  • Oncode Institute (NL)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Puschhof, Jens
  • Clevers, Hans
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
487-496.e6
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392638507
Cited by
106
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 14
FWCI
32.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • American Association for Cancer Research (SU2C-3.1416)
  • European Research Council (864499)
  • Hubrecht Institute
  • Cancer Research UK (C10674/A27140)
  • Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap
  • National Human Genome Research Institute
  • Entertainment Industry Foundation
  • Oncode Institute
  • National Cancer Institute
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • New York Stem Cell Foundation
  • Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding
  • Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
  • Energy Council of Canada (2F8, CFF16-2F8, CFF159-19H2, 19H2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
colibactin, Escherichia coli, colorectal cancer, intestinal organoids, mutagenicity, genotoxicity, Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, probiotics, DNA double-strand breaks, APC mutation, mutational signatures, age at diagnosis
MeSH terms
DNA Damage, Escherichia coli, Humans, Mutagens, Mutation, Organoids, Peptides, Colorectal Neoplasms, Polyketides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review