Cited by 481Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Somatic mutation rates scale with lifespan across mammals

Open access
Cagan, Alex, Baez-Ortega, Adrian, Brzozowska, Natalia, Abascal, Federico, Coorens, Tim H. H., Sanders, Mathijs A., Lawson, Andrew R. J., Harvey, Luke M. R. +31 more·2022·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The rates and patterns of somatic mutation in normal tissues are largely unknown outside of humans 1–7 . Comparative analyses can shed light on the diversity of mutagenesis across species, and on long-standing hypotheses about the evolution of somatic mutation rates and their role in cancer and ageing. Here we performed whole-genome sequencing of 208 intestinal crypts from 56 individuals to study the landscape of somatic mutation across 16 mammalian species. We found that somatic mutagenesis was dominated by seemingly endogenous mutational processes in all species, including 5-methylcytosine deamination and oxidative damage. With some differences, mutational signatures in other species resembled those described in humans 8 , although the relative contribution of each signature varied across species. Notably, the somatic mutation rate per year varied greatly across species and exhibited a strong inverse relationship with species lifespan, with no other life-history trait studied showing a comparable association. Despite widely different life histories among the species we examined—including variation of around 30-fold in lifespan and around 40,000-fold in body mass—the somatic mutation burden at the end of lifespan varied only by a factor of around 3. These data unveil common mutational processes across mammals, and suggest that somatic mutation rates are evolutionarily constrained and may be a contributing factor in ageing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-04618-z

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cagan, A., Baez-Ortega, A., Brzozowska, N., Abascal, F., Coorens, T. H. H., Sanders, M. A., Lawson, A. R. J., Harvey, L. M. R., Bhosle, S., Jones, D., Alcantara, R. E., Butler, T. M., Hooks, Y., Roberts, K., Anderson, E., Lunn, S., Flach, E., Spiro, S., Januszczak, I., Wrigglesworth, E., Jenkins, H., Dallas, T., Masters, N., Perkins, M. W., Deaville, R., Druce, M., Bogeska, R., Milsom, M. D., Neumann, B., Gorman, F., Constantino-Casas, F., Peachey, L., Bochynska, D., Smith, E. S. J., Gerstung, M., Campbell, P. J., Murchison, E. P., Stratton, M. R., & Martincorena, I.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Zoological Society of London (GB)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca (RO)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Cagan, Alex
  • Martincorena, Iñigo
Venue
Nature
Published
2022-04-13
Volume
604
Issue
7906
Pages
517-524
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4225246272
Cited by
481
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 4
FWCI
33.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Hematology Association (TRTH182)
  • Wellcome Trust (206194)
  • Cancer Research UK (21777, C57387/A21777)
  • Dunhill Medical Trust (RPGF2002188)
  • José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/S000127/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
somatic mutation rate, lifespan, mutational signatures, intestinal crypts, 5-methylcytosine deamination, oxidative DNA damage, endogenous mutagenesis, cross-species comparison, mammals, aging, cancer, evolutionary constraints, life-history traits
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Longevity, Mammals, Mutation, Mutagenesis, Mutation Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review