Ionic liquid based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of aromatic amines in water samples
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dispersion in DLLME can be achieved by ultrasound or by repeatedly aspiring and injecting the sample with the disperser solvent.
“In other cases, dispersion is by ultrasound [17] or repeatedly aspiring and injecting the sample with the disperser solvent [18,19].”
From Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes (2010) · cites this paper as [19]
IL-DLLME has a drawback of a wide peak at the beginning of the chromatogram corresponding to the IL.
“As can be seen, at the beginning of the chromatogram, there appeared a wide peak, corresponding to the IL - one of the main drawbacks of using IL-DLLME, as already reported [14-19,32,38,47,50,65-67] -although, in this case, it did not interfere at all in the separation.”
From Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes (2010) · cites this paper as [19]
Amines and nitrogenous compounds have been target analytes in DLLME, including aromatic amines from waters, biogenic amines from rice wine, and nitrotoluenes from water samples.
“Amines and nitrogenous compounds have also been target analytes in DLLME. These applications include the extraction of aromatic amines from waters [19,87,88], biogenic amines from rice wine [89] and nitrotoluenes from water samples [19,90,91].”
From Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes (2010) · cites this paper as [19]
For Fan et al.'s IL-DLLME of four aromatic amines, spiked recoveries were 93.4-106.4% and LODs were 0.45-2.6 μg/L.
“The spiked recoveries were in the range 93.4-106.4% and LODs were 0.45-2.6 l g/L.”
From Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes (2010) · cites this paper as [19]
A wide peak corresponding to the IL appeared at the beginning of the chromatogram but did not interfere with the correct determination of the four analytes.
“As occurred in other works, a wide peak corresponding to the IL appeared at the beginning of the chromatogram, but did not interfere at all in the correct determination of the four analytes.”
From Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes (2010) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Rezaee, M., Assadi, Y., Milani Hosseini, M.-R., Aghaee, E., Ahmadi, F., & Berijani, S. (2006) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.007 · Cited by 3,402 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method
Rezaee, M., Yamini, Y., & Faraji, M. (2010) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.088 · Cited by 971 · see citing works
Green aspects, developments and perspectives of liquid phase microextraction techniques
Spietelun, A., Marcinkowski, Ł., de la Guardia, M., & Namieśnik, J. (2014) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2013.10.050 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes
Herrera-Herrera, A. V., Asensio-Ramos, M., Hernández-Borges, J., & Rodríguez-Delgado, M. Á. (2010) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2010.03.016 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
The roles of ionic liquids in sorptive microextraction techniques
Aguilera-Herrador, E., Lucena, R., Cárdenas, S., & Valcárcel, M. (2010) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2009.11.009 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Responsive switchable deep eutectic solvents: A review
Zhang, J., Li, S., Yao, L., Yi, Y., Shen, L., Li, Z., & Qiu, H. (2023) · Chinese Chemical Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107750 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Separation and Preconcentration by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Procedure: A Review
Bosch Ojeda, C., & Sánchez Rojas, F. (2009) · Chromatographia · doi:10.1365/s10337-009-1104-1 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Ten years of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and derived techniques
Campillo, N., Viñas, P., Šandrejová, J., & Andruch, V. (2017) · Applied Spectroscopy Reviews · doi:10.1080/05704928.2016.1224240 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Ionic liquids in microextraction techniques
Vičkačkaitė, V., & Padarauskas, A. (2012) · Open Chemistry · doi:10.2478/s11532-012-0023-4 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Greening Sample Preparation: New Solvents, New Sorbents
Ramos, L. (2020) · Challenges in Green Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1039/9781788016148-00114 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fan, Y. C., Hu, Z. L., Chen, M. L., Tu, C. S., & Zhu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Zhejiang Shuren University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Yan
- Venue
- Chinese Chemical Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 985-987
- ISSN
- 1001-8417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992153787
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chinese Chemical Letters (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- aromatic amines, 2-methylaniline, 4-chloroaniline, 1-naphthylamine, 4-aminobiphenyl, water samples, preconcentration, HPLC determination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review