Cited by 155Neuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsGene expression and cancer classificationBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expression profiling using a tumor-specific cDNA microarray predicts the prognosis of intermediate risk neuroblastomas

Open access

Abstract

To predict the prognosis of neuroblastoma patients and choose a better therapeutic protocol, we developed a cDNA microarray carrying 5340 genes obtained from primary neuroblastomas and examined 136 tumor samples. We made a probabilistic output statistical classifier that provided a high accuracy in prognosis prediction (89% at 5 years) and a highly reliable method to validate it. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the patients in an intermediate group defined by existing markers are divided by microarray into two further groups with 5 year survivals for 36% and 89% of patients (p < 10(-4)), i.e., with unfavorably and favorably predicted neuroblastomas, respectively. According to these results, we developed a gene subset chip for a clinical tool, for which our classifier exhibited 88% prediction accuracy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 155

Metadata

Authors
Ohira, M., Oba, S., Nakamura, Y., Isogai, E., Kaneko, S., Nakagawa, A., Hirata, T., Kubo, H., Goto, T., Yamada, S., Yoshida, Y., Fuchioka, M., Ishii, S., & Nakagawara, A.
Affiliations
  • Chiba Cancer Center (JP)
  • Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Aichi Medical University (JP)
  • Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical (Japan) (JP)
  • NGK Insulators (Japan) (JP)
  • SRL (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakagawara, Akira
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
337-350
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110417418
Cited by
155
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
neuroblastoma, intermediate-risk neuroblastoma, outcome prediction, gene expression profiling, probabilistic classifiers, clinical decision support, survival prediction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Neuroblastoma, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Survival Analysis, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review