The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expression profiling using a tumor-specific cDNA microarray predicts the prognosis of intermediate risk neuroblastomas
Open accessAbstract
To predict the prognosis of neuroblastoma patients and choose a better therapeutic protocol, we developed a cDNA microarray carrying 5340 genes obtained from primary neuroblastomas and examined 136 tumor samples. We made a probabilistic output statistical classifier that provided a high accuracy in prognosis prediction (89% at 5 years) and a highly reliable method to validate it. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the patients in an intermediate group defined by existing markers are divided by microarray into two further groups with 5 year survivals for 36% and 89% of patients (p < 10(-4)), i.e., with unfavorably and favorably predicted neuroblastomas, respectively. According to these results, we developed a gene subset chip for a clinical tool, for which our classifier exhibited 88% prediction accuracy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, a number of microarray-based gene expression models have been proposed to predict neuroblastoma patient outcome [16, 17].”
From Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray-based models for clinical endpoint prediction (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“The models significantly discriminated patients with favorable and unfavorable outcome in the entire cohort and in the class labeled cohort (Additional file 1: Figure S9a-d, Table S3 and S4), which is consistent with previous observations made by us and others [16–18, 20].”
From Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray-based models for clinical endpoint prediction (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Both gene expression-based models derived from RNA-seq and microarray analyses were capable of predicting patient outcome in the entire neuroblastoma cohort accurately, thereby validating results from previous studies and underscoring their potential clinical utility for risk estimation in neuroblastoma [16–18, 20].”
From Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray-based models for clinical endpoint prediction (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Single-Step Method of RNA Isolation by Acid Guanidinium Thiocyanate–Phenol–Chloroform Extraction
Chomczynski, P., & Sacchi, N. (1987) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1987.9999 · Cited by 65,515
Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots
Cleveland, W. S. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038 · Cited by 11,594
Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.531 · Cited by 11,516
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
Brodeur, G. M., Pritchard, J., Berthold, F., Carlsen, N., Castel, V., Castelberry, R. P., Bernardi, B. D., Evans, A. E., Favrot, M., & Hedborg, F. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.8.1466 · Cited by 2,285
Amplification of N- myc in Untreated Human Neuroblastomas Correlates with Advanced Disease Stage
Brodeur, G. M., Seeger, R. C., Schwab, M., VARMUS, H. E., & Bishop, J. M. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6719137 · Cited by 2,261
Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma
Beer, D. G., Kardia, S. L. R., Huang, C.-C., Giordano, T. J., Levin, A. M., Misek, D. E., Lin, L., Chen, G., Gharib, T. G., Thomas, D. G., et al. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm733 · Cited by 2,025
Schwab, M., Alitalo, K. K., Klempnauer, K.-H., VARMUS, H. E., Bishop, J. M., Gilbert, F., Brodeur, G. M., Goldstein, M. N., & Trent, J. M. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/305245a0 · Cited by 1,405
Shimada, H., Chatten, J., Newton, W. A., Sachs, N., Hamoudi, A. B., Chiba, T., Marsden, H. B., & Misugi, K. (1984) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/73.2.405 · Cited by 858
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Advances in Neuroblastoma
Maris, J. M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0804577 · Cited by 2,025
Applications of Machine Learning in Cancer Prediction and Prognosis
Cruz, J. A., & Wishart, D. S. (2006) · Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1177/117693510600200030 · Cited by 1,371
Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.
Cruz, J. A., & Wishart, D. S. (2007) · PubMed Central · Cited by 879
Ambros, P. F., Ambros, I. M., Brodeur, G. M., Haber, M., Khan, J. I., Nakagawara, A., Schleiermacher, G., Speleman, F., Spitz, R. E., London, W. B., et al. (2009) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605014 · Cited by 403
Self-citationComparison of RNA-seq and microarray-based models for clinical endpoint prediction
Zhang, W., Yu, Y., Hertwig, F., Thierry-Mieg, J., Zhang, W., Thierry-Mieg, D., Wang, J., Furlanello, C., Devanarayan, V., Cheng, J., et al. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0694-1 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohira, M., Oba, S., Nakamura, Y., Isogai, E., Kaneko, S., Nakagawa, A., Hirata, T., Kubo, H., Goto, T., Yamada, S., Yoshida, Y., Fuchioka, M., Ishii, S., & Nakagawara, A.
- Affiliations
- Chiba Cancer Center (JP)
- Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
- University of Tsukuba (JP)
- Aichi Medical University (JP)
- Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical (Japan) (JP)
- NGK Insulators (Japan) (JP)
- SRL (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Nakagawara, Akira
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-350
- ISSN
- 1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110417418
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 8.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Keywords
- neuroblastoma, intermediate-risk neuroblastoma, outcome prediction, gene expression profiling, probabilistic classifiers, clinical decision support, survival prediction
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Neuroblastoma, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Survival Analysis, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
