Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Green synthesis of metal–organic frameworks: A state-of-the-art review of potential environmental and medical applications

Open access
Kumar, Sandeep, Jain, Shikha, Nehra, Monika, Dilbaghi, Neeraj, Marrazza, Giovanna, Kim, Ki-Hyun·2020·Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Abstract

Abstract Sustainable methods of synthesizing metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are of paramount importance to energy conservation efforts and environmental remediation. It can be a significant tool in the global campaign to avoid use of hazardous substances, such as metal ions, organic solvents, and complexes in metal–organic chemistry. MOFs with porosity and crystalline nature offer structural tunability via variation in metal node and organic linker that promote their wide applicability at both scientific and industrial level. Besides fascinating properties of MOFs, their real field applications are still limited due to adverse environmental impact of the conventional synthesis approaches. Considerable research efforts have been devoted to devising clean and sustainable synthesis routes for MOFs to reduce the environmental impact of their preparation. This review covers the design strategies for greener, more energy-efficient, and less-toxic MOF synthesis through application of 12 green chemistry principles. Attention is given to development of green and industrially acceptable MOF chemistry based on (i) safer solvent/or reaction media, (ii) sustainable metal ions, and (iii) biocompatible (i.e., biomolecule/biomass-derived) organic linkers. The versatile functionality, biodegradability, biocompatible nature, and high drug loading capacity of green MOFs are highly promising for environmental and medical applications. In this review, the recent update on applicability of green MOFs in catalysis, adsorption/separation processes, and therapeutics is highlighted. In the last section, outlook and future challenges are illustrated, keeping in view their disposal and health related concerns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213407

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, S., Jain, S., Nehra, M., Dilbaghi, N., Marrazza, G., & Kim, K.-H.
Venue
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
420
Pages
213407
ISSN
0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034739261
Cited by
498
References
3
FWCI
35.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green synthesis of metal–organic frameworks: A state-of-the-art review of potential environmental and medical applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213407
The paper
Kumar, S., Jain, S., Nehra, M., Dilbaghi, N., Marrazza, G., & Kim, K.-H. (2020). Green synthesis of metal–organic frameworks: A state-of-the-art review of potential environmental and medical applications. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.