Cited by 107Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Development and Environmental ManagementSustainable Industrial Ecology

Reshaping global policies for circular economy

Open access
Zeng, Xianlai, Ogunseitan, Oladele A., Nakamura, Shinichiro, Suh, Sangwon, Kral, Ulrich, Li, Jinhui, Geng, Yong·2022·Circular Economy

Abstract

Circular economy is recognized as a powerful integrative framework envisioned to solve societal problems linked to environmental pollution and resource depletion. Its adoption is rapidly reforming manufacturing, production, consumption, and recycling across various segments of the economy. However, circular economy may not always be effective or even desirable owing to the spatiotemporal dimensions of environmental risk of materials, and variability of global policies. Circular flows involving toxic materials may impose a high risk on the environment and public health such that overemphasis on anthropogenic circularity is not desirable. Moreover, waste flows at a global scale might result in an uneven distribution of risks and costs associated with a circular economy. Among other benefits, circular economy needs to generate environmental advantages, energy savings, and reductions of greenhouse gas emissions. Recent attempts to implement the carbon neutrality strategy globally will likely push the circular economy further into more economic sectors, but challenges remain in implementing and enforcing international policies across national boundaries. The United Nations Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste and their disposal is used here as an example to illustrate the challenges and to propose a way forward for anthropogenic circularity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cec.2022.100003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ayres, R. U. (1992). Toxic heavy metals: Materials cycle optimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 815e820.
  2. Fang, S., Yan, W., Cao, H., Song, Q., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2018). Evaluation on end-of- life LEDs by understanding the criticality and recyclability for metals recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 624e633.
  3. Mayer, A., Haas, W., Wiedenhofer, D., Krausmann, F., Nuss, P., & Blengini, G. A. (2019). Measuring progress towards a circular economy: A monitoring frame- work for economy-wide material loop closing in the EU28. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23, 62e76.
  4. Ohno, H., Matsubae, K., Nakajima, K., Nakamura, S., & Nagasaka, T. (2014). Unin- tentional flow of alloying elements in steel during recycling of end-of-life ve- hicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18, 242e253.
  5. Winterstetter, A., Heuss-Assbichler, S., Stegemann, J., Kral, U., W€ ager, P., Osmani, M., & Rechberger, H. (2021). The role of anthropogenic resource classification in supporting the transition to a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126753.
  6. Zeng, X., & Li, J. (2016). Measuring the recyclability of e-waste: An innovative method and its implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 156e162.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, X., Ogunseitan, O. A., Nakamura, S., Suh, S., Kral, U., Li, J., & Geng, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Waseda University (JP)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Environment Agency Austria (AT)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Geng, Yong
Venue
Circular Economy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
100003
ISSN
2773-1677 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280488247
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 7
FWCI
15.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circular Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1908501)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71810107001, 92062111, 72088101)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Keywords
global policy, Basel Convention, hazardous waste, transboundary movement of waste, toxic materials, environmental risk, waste streams, resource depletion, recycling, carbon neutrality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review