Cited by 42Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisMunicipal Solid Waste Management

A first comprehensive estimate of electronic waste in Canada

Habib, Komal, Mohammadi, Elham, Vihanga Withanage, Sohani·2023·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Detailed analysis of electronic waste (e-waste) generation and composition is of utmost importance for the proper management of growing e-waste stream worldwide, containing both hazardous and valuable materials. Considering the absence of such comprehensive and up-to-date studies in Canada, this work presents the first estimate of put-on-market electrical and electronic equipment (EEE), the in-use stocks of EEE and e-waste generation in Canada from 1971 to 2030 for 51 product categories comprising 198 product types. Using a dynamic material flow analysis (MFA), the put-on-market EEE is estimated based on trade data retrieved from national and international import and export statistics, and the in-use stocks of EEE and the resulting e-waste are calculated using the Weibull distribution function. The results show that the total mass of EEE within the 60-year period is estimated to be 42.3 million tonnes, with an annual average growth rate of approximately 0.5%. By 2030, the total accumulated in-use stock of EEE is estimated to exceed 13 million tonnes. The estimated e-waste over the 60-year timespan is 29.1 million tonnes. The total annual e-waste generation in Canada is calculated to be 252 kilo tonnes (kt) and 954 kt in the years 2000 and 2020 respectively, which is estimated to reach 1.2 million tonnes by 2030. The e-waste generation per capita increased from 8.3 kg in 2000 to 25.3 kg in 2020 and is estimated to reach 31.5 kg by 2030. This quantification provides valuable insights to policymakers for setting up targets for waste reduction and identifying the resource circularity potential for efficient management of e-waste.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130865

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Parajuly, 2017, Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Denmark: Flows, quantities and management, Resour, Conserv Recycl, 123, 85, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.004 · DOI
  2. Parajuly, 2017, Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Denmark: Flows, quantities and management, Resour, Conserv Recycl, 123, 85, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.004 · DOI
  3. Puckett, 2018, Export of e-waste from Canada. a story as told by GPS trackers [E-Trash Transparency Project], Basal Action Netw

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Habib, K., Mohammadi, E., & Vihanga Withanage, S.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Habib, Komal
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
448
Pages
130865
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4318305552
Cited by
42
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2017-05218)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
electronic waste, e-waste generation, electrical and electronic equipment, in-use stocks, material flow analysis, Weibull distribution, waste reduction targets, circular economy, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review