Cited by 66Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materialsIndustrial Gas Emission Control

Improvement of CO2 uptake of activated carbons by treatment with mineral acids

Gęsikiewicz-Puchalska, A., Zgrzebnicki, M., Michalkiewicz, B., Narkiewicz, U., Morawski, A.W., Wrobel, R.J.·2017·Chemical Engineering Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.005

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gęsikiewicz-Puchalska, A., Zgrzebnicki, M., Michalkiewicz, B., Narkiewicz, U., Morawski, A. W., & Wrobel, R. J.
Affiliations
West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin (PL)
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
309
Pages
159-171
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2527704507
Cited by
66
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
Keywords
activated carbon, CO2 adsorption, acid treatment, mineral matter removal, specific surface area, surface oxidation, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, pore blocking, sorbent modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review