Cited by 173Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

Green preparation of magnetic biochar for the effective accumulation of Pb(II): performance and mechanism

Open access
Zhao, Yueling, Zhang, Ruyu, Liu, Haibo, Li, Mengxue, Chen, Tianhu, Chen, Dong, Zou, Xuehua, Frost, Ray L.·2019·Chemical Engineering Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122011

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A narrow peak around 30° was found and identified as amorphous carbon.

    “A narrow peak at around 30 ◦ was found and identified as amorphous carbon (Fu et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2019).”

    From Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on PhysicoChemical Properties and Acoustic-Based Amination of Biochar for Efficient CO2 Adsorption (2020) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2019

    The XRD section describes a broad reflection spanning 2θ = 15–30° and identifies it as amorphous carbon. That contradicts the claim that the feature was a narrow peak around 30°. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. W.U. Mingshan, M.A. Jianfeng, S. Yang, G. Tian, Y. Wang, X. Liu, Progress of the magnetic biochar composite materials, Journal of Functional Materials 47 (2016) 7028-7033.
  2. Y. Xi, M. Mallavarapu, R. Naidu, Reduction and adsorption of Pb 2+ in aqueous solution by nano-zero-valent iron-A SEM, TEM and XPS study, Materials Research Bulletin 45 (2010) 1361-1367.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., Zhang, R., Liu, H., Li, M., Chen, T., Chen, D., Zou, X., & Frost, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Hefei University of Technology (CN)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Haibo
  • Frost, Ray L.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
375
Pages
122011
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952476022
Cited by
173
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 5
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
magnetic biochar, lead removal, lead adsorption, hematite, pyrolysis temperature, pore structure, iron oxidation state, magnetic separation, surface complexation, biomass utilization, heavy metal removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review