Cited by 85Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

An efficient biochar adsorbent for CO2 capture: Combined experimental and theoretical study on the promotion mechanism of N-doping

Li, Hongxian, Tang, Minghui, Huang, Xinlei, Wang, Ling, Liu, Qi, Lu, Shengyong·2023·Chemical Engineering Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2023.143095

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, H., Tang, M., Huang, X., Wang, L., Liu, Q., & Lu, S.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (CN)
Corresponding author
Tang, Minghui
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
466
Pages
143095
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366748279
Cited by
85
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 5
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (ZJUCEU2021010)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
N-doped biochar, CO2 adsorption, CO2 capture, corn cob, micropores, adsorption kinetics, activation energy, adsorption energy, dispersion interactions, biomass waste valorization, CO2/N2 selectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review