Cited by 161Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Carbon dioxide capture using various metal oxyhydroxide–biochar composites

Open access
Creamer, Anne Elise, Gao, Bin, Wang, Shengsen·2016·Chemical Engineering Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.037

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creamer, A. E., Gao, B., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Gao, Bin
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
283
Pages
826-832
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1430560780
Cited by
161
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Chemical Engineering Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NSF (CBET-1054405)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
CO2 capture, aluminum hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, iron oxide, biochar, physisorption, biomass pyrolysis, adsorbent regeneration, surface area, CO2 adsorption capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review