Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 463

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chromosome Catastrophes Involve Replication Mechanisms Generating Complex Genomic Rearrangements

Open access
Liu, Pengfei, Erez, Ayelet, Nagamani, Sandesh C. Sreenath, Dhar, Shweta U., Kołodziejska, Katarzyna E., Dharmadhikari, Avinash V., Cooper, M. Lance, Wiszniewska, Joanna, Zhang, Feng, Withers, Marjorie A., Bacino, Carlos A., Campos-Acevedo, Luis Daniel, Delgado, Mauricio R., Freedenberg, Debra, Garnica, Adolfo, Grebe, Theresa A., Hernández-Almaguer, Dolores, Immken, LaDonna, Lalani, Seema R., McLean, Scott D., Northrup, Hope, Scaglia, Fernando, Strathearn, Lane, Trapane, Pamela, Kang, Sung-Hae L., Patel, Ankita, Cheung, Sau Wai, Hastings, P.J., Stankiewicz, Paweł, Lupski, James R., Bi, Weimin·2011·Cell

Abstract

SUMMARY Complex genomic rearrangements (CGR) consisting of two or more breakpoint junctions have been observed in genomic disorders. Recently, a chromosome catastrophe phenomenon termed chromothripsis, in which numerous genomic rearrangements are apparently acquired in one single catastrophic event, was described in multiple cancers. Here we show that constitutionally acquired CGRs share similarities with cancer chromothripsis. In the 17 CGR cases investigated we observed localization and multiple copy number changes including deletions, duplications and/or triplications, as well as extensive translocations and inversions. Genomic rearrangements involved varied in size and complexities; in one case, array comparative genomic hybridization revealed 18 copy number changes. Breakpoint sequencing identified characteristic features, including small templated insertions at breakpoints and microhomology at breakpoint junctions, which have been attributed to replicative processes. The resemblance between CGR and chromothripsis suggests similar mechanistic underpinnings. Such chromosome catastrophic events appear to reflect basic DNA metabolism operative throughout an organism’s life cycle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.042

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 463

Metadata

Authors
Liu, P., Erez, A., Nagamani, S. C. S., Dhar, S. U., Kołodziejska, K. E., Dharmadhikari, A. V., Cooper, M. L., Wiszniewska, J., Zhang, F., Withers, M. A., Bacino, C. A., Campos-Acevedo, L. D., Delgado, M. R., Freedenberg, D., Garnica, A., Grebe, T. A., Hernández-Almaguer, D., Immken, L., Lalani, S. R., McLean, S. D., Northrup, H., Scaglia, F., Strathearn, L., Trapane, P., Kang, S.-H. L., Patel, A., Cheung, S. W., Hastings, P. J., Stankiewicz, P., Lupski, J. R., & Bi, W.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
146
Issue
6
Pages
889-903
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086881223
Cited by
463
References
5
FWCI
25.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromosome Catastrophes Involve Replication Mechanisms Generating Complex Genomic Rearrangements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.042
The paper
Liu, P., Erez, A., Nagamani, S. C. S., Dhar, S. U., Kołodziejska, K. E., Dharmadhikari, A. V., Cooper, M. L., Wiszniewska, J., Zhang, F., Withers, M. A., Bacino, C. A., Campos-Acevedo, L. D., Delgado, M. R., Freedenberg, D., Garnica, A., Grebe, T. A., Hernández-Almaguer, D., Immken, L., Lalani, S. R., . . . Bi, W. (2011). Chromosome Catastrophes Involve Replication Mechanisms Generating Complex Genomic Rearrangements. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.