The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing Synthetic Regulatory Networks Capable of Self-Organizing Cell Polarization
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY How cells form global, self-organized structures using genetically encoded molecular rules remains elusive. Here, we take a synthetic biology approach to investigate the design principles governing cell polarization. First, using a coarse-grained computational model, we searched for all possible simple networks that can achieve polarization. All solutions contained one of three minimal motifs – positive feedback, mutual inhibition, or inhibitor with positive feedback. These minimal motifs alone could achieve polarization under limited conditions; circuits that combined two or more of these motifs were significantly more robust. With these design principles as a blueprint, we experimentally constructed artificial polarization networks in yeast, using a toolkit of chimeric signaling proteins that spatially direct the synthesis and degradation of phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3). Circuits with combinatorial motifs yielded clear foci of synthetic PIP3 that can persist for nearly an hour. Thus, by harnessing localization-regulated signaling molecules, we can engineer simple molecular circuits that reliably execute spatial self-organized programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems
Purnick, P. E. M., & Weiss, R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2698 · Cited by 1,181
The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module
von Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E. M., & Odell, G. M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35018085 · Cited by 1,144
Robustness and modular design of the Drosophila segment polarity network
Ma, W., Lai, L., Ouyang, Q., & Tang, C. (2006) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100111 · Cited by 142
Self-citation
Cited by
A brief history of synthetic biology
Cameron, D. E., Bashor, C. J., & Collins, J. J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3239 · Cited by 933
Development and dynamics of cell polarity at a glance
Campanale, J. P., Sun, T. Y., & Montell, D. J. (2017) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.188599 · Cited by 198
MiRNAs confer phenotypic robustness to gene networks by suppressing biological noise
Siciliano, V., Garzilli, I., Fracassi, C., Criscuolo, S., Ventre, S., & di Bernardo, D. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3364 · Cited by 166
Exploring single cells in space and time during tissue development, homeostasis and regeneration
Mayr, U., Serra, D., & Liberali, P. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.176727 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Chau, A. H., Walter, J. M., Gerardin, J., Tang, C., & Lim, W. A.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 320-332
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002189052
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.