Cited by 1,029Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Open access
Zhang, Hui, Liu, Tao, Zhang, Zhen, Payne, Samuel H., Zhang, Bai, McDermott, Jason E., Zhou, Jian-Ying, Petyuk, Vladislav A. +98 more·2016·Cell

Abstract

To provide a detailed analysis of the molecular components and underlying mechanisms associated with ovarian cancer, we performed a comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteomic characterization of 174 ovarian tumors previously analyzed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), of which 169 were high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs). Integrating our proteomic measurements with the genomic data yielded a number of insights into disease, such as how different copy-number alternations influence the proteome, the proteins associated with chromosomal instability, the sets of signaling pathways that diverse genome rearrangements converge on, and the ones most associated with short overall survival. Specific protein acetylations associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggest a potential means for stratifying patients for therapy. In addition to providing a valuable resource, these findings provide a view of how the somatic genome drives the cancer proteome and associations between protein and post-translational modification levels and clinical outcomes in HGSC. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.069

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPTAC applied standards and workflows to tumours previously genomically characterized by The Cancer Genome Atlas, pioneered the integration of proteomics with genomics to produce a more unified and comprehensive understanding of cancer biology, and implemented its transition into cancer clinical research studies.

    “CPTAC applied these standards and workflows to tumours previously genomically characterized by The Cancer Genome Atlas. In doing so, CPTAC pioneered the integration of proteomics with genomics (i.e., proteogenomics) to produce a more unified and comprehensive understanding of cancer biology and implemented its transition into cancer clinical research studies96,104,105.”

    From A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome (2020) · cites this paper as [105]

  • The flagship efforts of the Cancer Proteomics Consortium, CPTAC, have brought targeted proteomics and proteogenomics into regular use and produced major studies on ovarian, breast, and colorectal cancer.

    “The flagship efforts of the Cancer Proteomics Consortium, CPTAC, have brought targeted proteomics and proteogenomics into regular use and produced major studies on ovarian ( 10 ), breast ( 11 ), and colorectal cancer ( 12 ).”

    From The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the human proteome (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Liu, T., Zhang, Z., Payne, S. H., Zhang, B., McDermott, J. E., Zhou, J.-Y., Petyuk, V. A., Chen, L., Ray, D., Sun, S., Yang, F., Chen, L., Wang, J., Shah, P., Cha, S. W., Aiyetan, P., Woo, S., Tian, Y., Gritsenko, M. A., Clauss, T. R., Choi, C., Monroe, M. E., Thomas, S., Nie, S., Wu, C., Moore, R. J., Yu, K.-H., Tabb, D. L., Fenyö, D., Bafna, V., Wang, Y., Rodriguez, H., Boja, E. S., Hiltke, T., Rivers, R. C., Sokoll, L., Zhu, H., Shih, I.-M., Cope, L., Pandey, A., Zhang, B., Snyder, M. P., Levine, D. A., Smith, R. D., Chan, D. W., Rodland, K. D., Carr, S. A., Gillette, M. A., Klauser, K. R., Kuhn, E., Mani, D. R., Mertins, P., Ketchum, K. A., Thangudu, R., Cai, S., Oberti, M., Paulovich, A. G., Whiteaker, J. R., Edwards, N. J., McGarvey, P. B., Madhavan, S., Wang, P., Chan, D. W., Pandey, A., Shih, I.-M., Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., Zhu, H., Cope, L., Whiteley, G. A., Skates, S. J., White, F. M., Levine, D. A., Boja, E. S., Kinsinger, C. R., Hiltke, T., Mesri, M., Rivers, R. C., Rodriguez, H., Shaw, K. M., Stein, S. E., Fenyo, D., Liu, T., McDermott, J. E., Payne, S. H., Rodland, K. D., Smith, R. D., Rudnick, P., Snyder, M., Zhao, Y., Chen, X., Ransohoff, D. F., Hoofnagle, A. N., Liebler, D. C., Sanders, M. E., Shi, Z., Slebos, R. J. C., Tabb, D. L., Zhang, B., Zimmerman, L. J., Wang, Y., Davies, S. R., Ding, L., Ellis, M. J. C., & Townsend, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
755-765
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2464880876
Cited by
1,029
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 14
FWCI
135.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P41GM103493)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC05-76RL01830)
  • Battelle
  • National Cancer Institute (U24CA160019, U24CA160036)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
high-grade serous ovarian cancer, proteogenomics, tumor proteome, copy number alterations, chromosomal instability, genome rearrangement, signaling pathways, overall survival, protein acetylation, homologous recombination deficiency, post-translational modification, patient stratification
MeSH terms
Acetylation, DNA Repair, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Humans, Neoplasm Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Phosphoproteins, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Mass Spectrometry, Survival Analysis, Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous, Gene Dosage, Proteome, Chromosomal Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review